Skip to content
Browse articles

Sahitya-Mimamsa: Prakrit Text Restored

By V. M. Kulkarni

Vol. 5 · No. 2-3July-October 1976pp. 103–108English

Summary

V. M. Kulkarni’s article is a philological reconstruction of the Sahitya‑Mīmāṃsā, a lost or fragmentary treatise on poetics that originally existed in Prakrit. Scholars have long known of the text through references in later Sanskrit works, but no complete manuscript survives. Kulkarni scoured commentaries, anthologies and rhetorical compendia for citations and fragments, compiling them into a coherent structure. He then analysed the language, metre and technical vocabulary of these fragments to infer the original Prakrit wording. The Sahitya‑Mīmāṃsā appears to have been organised similarly to other poetics treatises: it defined key concepts such as kāvya (poetry), rasa (aesthetic sentiment), alankāra (figures of speech) and guṇa (poetic virtues). It discussed the classification of plots, the appropriate sentiments for different genres and the importance of suggestion (dhvani) in evoking emotions. Kulkarni argues that the work was influenced by but distinct from the better‑known Sanskrit treatise Dhvanyāloka. The Prakrit author drew examples from Jaina narratives and adapted Sanskrit theories to a vernacular milieu. In restoring the text, Kulkarni faced the challenge of reconstructing Prakrit forms from Sanskritised citations. He employed comparative phonology to reverse the Sanskritisation and consulted extant Prakrit grammars like Hemacandra’s Siddha‑hema. The article explains these methodological steps in detail and provides transliterations alongside translations. The reconstructed passages reveal a sophisticated poetics that balances adherence to classical norms with an appreciation for local idioms. Kulkarni suggests that the Sahitya‑Mīmāṃsā may have been composed between the twelfth and fourteenth centuries, when Jaina monks actively promoted Prakrit literature. The restored text not only fills a gap in our knowledge of Jaina literary theory but also highlights the pluralism of India’s aesthetic discourse. By bringing to light this Prakrit voice, the article challenges the Sanskrit‑centric narrative of Indian poetics and demonstrates that vernacular treatises contributed significantly to the development of literary criticism.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

Kulkarni’s painstaking reconstruction of the Sahitya‑Mīmāṃsā rescues from obscurity an important Prakrit treatise on aesthetics. The work shows that Jaina scholars engaged deeply with poetics and adapted Sanskrit theories to vernacular contexts. This recovery broadens our understanding of medieval literary theory and underscores the need for further manuscript research to unearth other lost texts.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “About «ix hundred verses are quoted from numerons sources m this work (Sthitya-Mimgmsa) out of which one hundred are Praknit''', In a paper published im “The Bulletin of the Chunjlal Gandhi Vidyabhavan”2 the text of fifty-erght Prakrit verses, which were oot very corrupt, was reato~”
  • “In this paper over forty Prakrit verses, out of which quite a few were highly corrupt, corrupt almost beyond recogollion, are duly restored, The rest aro simply indicated im the Index with the bope that eminent scho-lars of Sanskrit and Prakrit Ihtereture and Sanskrit poetics in the field would tackle them satisfactorily.”
  • “Whether we look at the verse from the point of view of poetry, aesthetics, robust logic all would agree that Hemacandra preserves the gathy in tts correct form,”

Works cited in this article

  1. The Bulletin of the Chunjlal Gandhi Vidyabhavan
  2. Dr. P.V Kane : The History of Sanskrit Postics (p, 268)
  3. Hemacandra’s KAS (p. 55)
  4. Locana (p, 284)
  5. Malat-Mudhana-Ill 15-16

Discussed in this article

People

Texts & works

  • Malat-Mudhana-Ill
  • Snkuntelam
  • Stkuntalam
  • Siddha-hema
  • Ventrakhara
  • Majlatt-Madhava
  • KM edition

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by V. M. Kulkarni

All articles →
Sambodhi

Reviews

By Satya Ranjan Banerjee, V. M. Kulkarni

2002
Sambodhi

Reviews

By V. M. Kulkarni

February - 1990
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Jain Aesthetic Concepts

By V. M. Kulkarni

January - 1990
Sambodhi

Location of Rasa

By V. M. Kulkarni

1990-1991

Continue reading

Related articles

Sambodhi

Some Doubtful Readings in the Kuvalayamala

By Anantalal Thakur

January - 1973