Skip to content
Browse articles

Treaty between Amir Khan and the English East India Company

By Brij Bhushanlal Srivastava

Vol. 39 · No. 1 & 2March and June 1963pp. 109–133English
British East India

Summary

This substantial article reconstructs the negotiations and consequences of the 1817 treaty between Nawab Amir Khan of Tonk and the English East India Company. Amir Khan, a former Maratha general and leader of a Pindari band, had carved out a principality in Rajasthan. By 1817 the Pindari raids threatened British interests, and Company agents, led by David Ochterlony and John Malcolm, sought to neutralise him. Drawing on British correspondence, Persian chronicles and Rajputana records, the author narrates the diplomatic manoeuvres. He notes that Amir Khan first approached the British to secure his jagirs and to obtain recognition in perpetuity for lands granted by the Holkar ruler. The Company demanded he disband his army, break ties with the Pindaris and surrender artillery; in return they offered him a hereditary pension, guarantees over his possessions and the rank of a British ally. The treaty, ratified on 9 November 1817, required Amir Khan to send his son as a hostage to Delhi and to accept British resident oversight. The article details subsequent correspondence in which Amir Khan negotiated for additional territories near Ajmer and sought relief from debts. The author analyses how British policy weighed the strategic value of securing Tonk as a buffer against Maratha and Pindari forces. After the treaty, Amir Khan enforced order in his domains, expelled former allies and assisted British troops in campaigns against Holkar and Pindari leaders. The article concludes by assessing the treaty’s significance: it marked the end of large‑scale Pindari raiding, integrated Tonk into the colonial state and exemplified the Company’s use of subsidiary alliances to control semi‑independent rulers without direct annexation.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

The paper concludes that the 1817 treaty with Amir Khan was a calculated compromise that extended British influence while preserving the nawab’s authority within a defined territory. By disbanding his army and accepting British suzerainty, Amir Khan secured hereditary rule for his family and averted destruction. The treaty exemplified the Company’s broader strategy of employing diplomacy and pensions to pacify former adversaries and stabilise the Rajputana frontier.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “He being alive to the inutility of opposing ‘the organized troops of the British’8 with his ‘undeciplined rabble,” decided to purchase . their friendship, while he himself held sufficient power.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Thakur Dass to Malcoln dated 24th March, 1806, 17th April 1806 F. & S
  2. Amir Khan to Lient. Col. Malcoln received dated 1st April, 1806 17 April, 1806 F. & S
  3. D. Ochterlony to J. Adam dated 25th March 1818 Cons. No. 13B, 4th April, 1818 F, & P
  4. C. 4. Metcalfe to 1. Adam dated 8th Feb. 1818, ૦૦૩56. no. 85, - 6th March, 1818 F, & P
  5. C. T. Metcalfe to 1. Adam dated 220d March 1817, Cons. No.

Discussed in this article

People

  • Amir Khan 4
  • J. Adam
  • C. T. Metcalfe
  • Mohd. Syed Khan
  • D. Ochterlony
  • Niranjan Lal
  • Hastings 3
  • Omar Khan
  • Lord Lake
  • Lt. Col. Malcon

Dynasties, sects & groups

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Continue reading

Related articles

Journal of Indian History and Culture

Sir William Langhorne's Administrative Reforms in Fort St. George, 1672-1678

By A. MUNUSWAMY

September 2009
Journal of Indian History and Culture

Lord Macaulay's Role in British East India Company's Educational Development

By M. Sathyalingam

June 2023