Skip to content
Browse articles

The Pandit Trio

January 1968pp. 24–32English

Summary

This essay sketches three contemporary scholars—Pandit Sukhlalji, Muni Jinavijaya, and Pandit Bechardasji—whose labours decisively shaped twentieth‑century Jain and Indological studies. Written with warmth rather than hagiography, the profile follows their early hardships, autodidactic discipline, and eventual leadership in textual editing, translation, and pedagogy. For each savant the essay notes a signature contribution: Sukhlalji’s philosophical clarity and guidance to students across traditions; Jinavijaya’s tireless archival work, expeditions to retrieve manuscripts, and service to monastic–scholarly cooperation; and Bechardasji’s lucid Gujarati/Hindi expositions that opened technical materials to wider audiences. A recurring theme is “scholarship as service”: knowledge pursued not for self‑display but for the community’s moral and intellectual benefit. The essay also maps the trio’s institutional worlds—Banaras Hindu University, research institutes, and Jain libraries—showing how modern academia and traditional learning can fruitfully interact. By placing personal character—frugality, fearlessness, integrity—beside academic output, the piece argues that the worth of scholarship in dharmic traditions lies as much in lived example as in printed pages. For readers today, the trio offers a model: cultivate languages rigorously, handle sources responsibly, cooperate across sects and regions, and keep the lay public in view so that learning circulates rather than stagnates.

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

Scholarship as service: rigorous languages, honest editing, and public‑facing pedagogy make learning fruitful for the whole community.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “Pandit Sokhlal, Muni Jinavijavii and Pandit Bechardasji constitote 1 trio whose contribution o the Orientlal leamidg in general and Jamism in particular hai heen widely appréciated.”
  • “They believe 1hat any principle which cannad be lived 15 valugless. The more they read and studied the bonks of wligion and philesophy, the more they felt 1he poverty of life in the midist ol plenty of philisophical platitudes.”
  • “Pandit Sukbialiiis one of the living authoitees oo Juinism. His studizs in Jainism ace all abong carned oo tn 1he broad perspeclive of the Indian pattern of thought and leamine.”

Works cited in this article

  1. ‘Sawson Toeta’

Discussed in this article

People

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Article order

In this issue

Current issue

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.