Skip to content
Browse articles

British Policy towards the Afghan War of Succession (1863-68)

By Anil Chandra Banerjee

Vol. 20 · No. 1March - 1944pp. 9–20English

Summary

The article examines British policy during the Afghan War of Succession from 1863 to 1868, focusing on the succession crisis following the death of Amir Dost Muhammad Khan in June 1863. The author argues that the primary challenge for the British Government of India was whether to recognize Amir Sher Ali Khan's succession and how to manage the rival factions of his brothers, particularly Sirdar Muhammad Amin Khan, Sirdar Muhammad Azim Khan, and Sirdar Muhammad Afzal Khan. The evidence relies heavily on official dispatches and reports, including the Foreign Department Proceedings of the Imperial Record Department, the Political Branch, and the India Office Records (P. P. (A) and P. P. (d)). The British Agent in Afghanistan, Ghulam Husain Khan, and the Commissioner of Peshawar are cited as key observers. The article details Sher Ali Khan's precarious position upon his succession. He faced immediate rebellions from his brother Amin Khan, who seized Kandahar, and Azim Khan, who fled to Logur. Afzal Khan initially maintained a facade of loyalty. The British, under Lord Lawrence, hesitated to grant immediate formal recognition to Sher Ali, a delay that the article suggests fueled the Amir's suspicions and encouraged his rivals to seek British intervention. The Amir actively sought British military aid, specifically 6,000 muskets, and requested a formal treaty of friendship, the styling of his son as Heir Apparent, and the pardon of an Afghan convict. The British granted the latter two requests but rejected the arms. As the internal conflict escalated, Afzal Khan marched from Turkistan with the support of the Sultan of Bukhara. The British Agent was instructed to observe the conflict without interference. The article traces the military maneuvers and shifting alliances, culminating in the defeat of Azim Khan in the Peiwar Pass in May 1864, leaving Sher Ali to face Afzal Khan. The author concludes by highlighting the severe instability in Kabul and the critical diplomatic tightrope the British had to walk during this period.

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

The British policy during the Afghan War of Succession (1863–1868) was largely characterized by strategic ambiguity, cautious observation, and a reluctance to provide decisive military or political support to Amir Sher Ali Khan. Facing a precarious internal position, the Amir actively sought formal recognition, a treaty of friendship, and military supplies from the British to consolidate his authority. However, the British administration, under the guidance of Lord Lawrence, consistently delayed formal acknowledgment of his succession and rejected his request for arms. This calculated non-intervention aimed to avoid direct entanglement in Afghan dynastic conflicts while maintaining a facade of neutrality. Consequently, British indecision and refusal to guarantee the Amir's position inadvertently encouraged rival Sirdars to believe that other alliances were possible. Ultimately, this policy of detached observation left Sher Ali isolated, forcing him to navigate a deeply fractured political landscape and ultimately leading to the outbreak of open civil war.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “The number of guards at the gaces of Herat® was increased. All Government property was removed to घाट fort.”
  • “The first rebel against घाट new Amir was his brother Sirdar Muhammad Amin Khan.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Imperial Record Department, Foreign Department Proceedings, Political A Branch, January, 1864, No. 280.
  2. P. A., September, 1863, No. 93.
  3. P(d), September, 1863, No. 95.

Discussed in this article

People

  • Amin
  • Sher Ali Khan
  • Ghulam Husain Khan
  • Sirdar Muhammad Azim Khan
  • Sirdar Muhammad Afzal Khan
  • Lord Lawrence 5
  • Sirdar Muhammad Amin Khan
  • Lord Elgin

Dynasties, sects & groups

  • Sirdars

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Anil Chandra Banerjee

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Expansion of the Rathor State in Marwar

By Anil Chandra Banerjee

June 1952
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Vinaya Texts in Chinese

By Anil Chandra Banerjee

June - 1949
The Indian Historical Quarterly

A New History of the Indian People: Vol. VI—The Gupta-Vakataka Age (Review)

By Anil Chandra Banerjee

September - 1946
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Subsidiary System in Marwar (1803-1843)

By Anil Chandra Banerjee

September - 1946

Continue reading

Related articles

The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Afghan War of Succession (1863-1869)

By Dharm Pal

September - 1946