Skip to content
Browse articles

Book Review

Vol. 14 · No. 021996pp. 82–84English

Summary

This book review of The Archetypal Actions of Ritual by Caroline Humphrey and James Laidlaw (Oxford, 1994) explores the authors' challenge to traditional anthropological views of ritual. Focusing on the aṣṭa-prakāri pūjā in Jain worship, they argue that rituals are not necessarily communicative or symbolic in a fixed way. Instead, they are often ambiguous, flexible, and "meaningless" from a theoretical standpoint, depending on the individual performer's intention rather than a universal structure. The authors promote a dialogical, open-ended approach to ritual theory, shifting interpretative power from scholars to participants. The book is recommended as an essential academic resource on Jain ritual studies.

Summary reviewed by a volunteer editor.

Conclusion

This review highlights The Archetypal Actions of Ritual as a groundbreaking work that challenges traditional anthropological views on ritual. By focusing on Jain pūjā, the authors advocate for a flexible, participant-driven interpretation of rituals, emphasizing their ambiguity and individual significance over fixed symbolic meanings. This approach offers a fresh perspective on Jain ritual studies, making the book a valuable academic resource.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “Reverberating with echoes of Frits Staal and Catherine Bell, the work through anecdotal documentation shows that rituals are intrinsically "meaningless," and to decode them as a single, unchanging, universal structure of communication between performer and performer, or performer and audience, falls to interpretative twists and spirals imposed by the theorizing observer.”
  • “Humphrey and Laidlaw question the "meaning" of ritual performance in the Jaina religious tradition, and question the very nature of ritual itself.”
  • “Thus ritualization, in two distinct ways, obscures the relation between action and the goals people might wish to achieve by it: first, the acts can be made symbolic, metaphorical, and so forth, because there is no need for them to conform to practical requirements; second, ritualized acts need have no sequential rationality of one in relation to another.”

Works cited in this article

  1. The Archetypal Actions of Ritual: A Theory of Ritual Illustrated by the Jain Rite Of Worship

Discussed in this article

People

Places

  • Dadabari Temple

Dynasties, sects & groups

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Continue reading

Related articles

The Indian Historical Quarterly

Reviews

By H. C. Ray, Niharranjan Roy

March - 1931
Sambodhi

Reviews

April 1981 - January 1982
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Review: History of Ancient India

By Dineshchandra Sircar

Deceber - 1942
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Reviews

By Sushil Kumar De, Batakrishna Ghosh, D. Bhattacharya

December - 1931
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Book Review – The Illustrated Manuscript of Jaina Ramayana

By Jyoti Prasad Jain

October - 1991
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Reviews

By Sushil Kumar De, Mano Mohan Ghosh, Benoy Kumar Sarkar, D. Bhattacharya

June - 1934