Skip to content
Browse articles

Was Lokanitha a Karana by Caste?

By Pandurang Vaman Kane

Vol. 11 · No. 3September - 1935pp. 585–586English
Epigraphic Text Analysis

Summary

In this note the author clarifies a common misreading of the title ‘Karana’ borne by an official named Lokanitha. Some historians had assumed that Lokanitha belonged to the Karana caste, a scribal group prevalent in eastern India. By analysing the grammatical context of inscriptional references, the author shows that the term in this case is not a caste name but an office. Lokanitha is described as mahakarana, chief of the karaṇa, meaning the royal secretariat or record office. The author compares similar usage in other inscriptions where titles such as karanik and sakha‑karana denote office‑holders irrespective of caste. He also points out that Lokanitha’s patronymic indicates that he belonged to a Brahmin family and that his land grants were typical of Brahmin recipients, not of Karanas. The confusion arises because in later centuries the word karana came to denote a caste group, but in the early medieval period it retained its original administrative meaning. The note concludes that accurate translation of technical terms is essential for reconstructing social history and that caution must be exercised before inferring caste from titles.

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

This clarification resolves a small but significant point about caste nomenclature. By distinguishing between office and lineage, the author demonstrates the pitfalls of reading later social categories back into earlier periods. The note reminds epigraphists to pay close attention to context before drawing conclusions about social identity from administrative titles.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “Mr. Pramode Lal Paul contributes an artiels ભા Adidira. A reference is made therein to the Tippera copper-plate ૪7૫ of Lokanatha (બાં about 650 A.D.) where it is said ‘Lokmnthe himself (is described} as a [ઘા by caste, which according 10 Manu, કેક & mixed - one.””
  • “Dr, Basak tranglated the expression Sri-papta-prapta-Karandya 85 ‘gave away to that Karana {Lokanitha), who obtained a royal charter.’”
  • “This is grammatically wrong. We should then except ‘praptagripatia Besides, to take the whole word 8 a Karmadhiraya makes it clumay Therefore the proper way of interpretation is to hold that the office {karana) held by Lokanatha was obtained by him under royal charter.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Dr. Radhagovinda Basak
  2. Caturvarga cintdmani
  3. EI., vol. VIII, p. 358; XII, p. 17; XX, p. 40
  4. Manu, VIII. 51, 52, 154

Discussed in this article

People

Texts & works

  • Tippera copper-plate
  • Was Lokanitha a Karana by Caste
  • Caturvarga cintdmani

Dynasties, sects & groups

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Continue reading

Related articles

The Indian Historical Quarterly

Kosam Inscription of Kanishka

By Amalananda Ghosh

September - 1934
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Asoka's Minor Rock Edict: the Yeragudi Copy

By B. M. Barua

March - 1937