Skip to content
Browse articles

Miniature Painting in Western India (12th–17th Century A.D.)

April 1970pp. 199–213English

Summary

W. Norman Brown provides a foundational, periodized survey of the Western Indian (often called “Śvetāmbara” or “Gujarātī”) school of Jain miniature painting from the twelfth to the seventeenth century. He distinguishes two material phases that also map to stylistic tendencies: an early palm-leaf phase (c. 1127–c. 1400) and a later paper phase (c. 1400–c. 1650). The first is characterized by compact folios, brick-red and ultramarine grounds, angular faces with prominently drawn, almond eyes, and vigorous contouring that privileges narrative clarity over naturalism. The second, adopting paper and sometimes larger formats, shows increased elegance, finer detailing, and occasional use of gold, while retaining hallmark features such as profile heads and frontal torsos. Brown collates dated manuscripts (e.g., Kalpa Sūtra, Kālakācārya-kathā) to anchor chronology, reviews museum holdings in India, Europe and the U.S., and tracks iconographic constants: enthroned Jinas; yaksha-yakshi pairs; donors; monks; urban settings rendered as tiered pavilions. He also notes external contacts—Persianate fashions, Rajput-Mughal dress elements, and temple sculpture prototypes—that artists selectively adapted. Technical remarks cover pigments (red lead, orpiment, indigo), calligraphy, and the transition from folio-by-folio illustration to fuller narrative cycles. The essay refutes the idea that the style is merely “provincial,” arguing instead for a continuous, inventive tradition with regional workshops and patrons. By placing manuscripts, murals and sculpture in dialogue, Brown offers a durable framework for understanding how Western Indian Jain painting balanced conservatism in iconography with gradual experiment in format, palette and surface finish.

Summary reviewed by a volunteer editor.

Conclusion

Brown’s survey stabilizes the field: a palm-leaf to paper transition, durable iconography, and selective external influences yield a coherent, inventive Western Indian style across five centuries.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “One of these flourished in Nepal and northern Bengal, with dated specimens starting in the eleventh century; the other in Gujarat, Kathiawar, and Rajputana, and is now known to have been existing in the early part of the twelfth century.”
  • “This ‘“‘Western Indan’’ school is one of great importance in the history of Indian painting. For one thing it contains all the western Indian painting, whether of large or small dimensions, known to exist over a period of some centuries, continuing the sequence of the frescoes at Ajanta, Bagh, and Elura.”
  • “Possibly in these miniatures of the K@lakacaryakatha we should be justified in seeing the first small intrusion into Indian painting of Persian elements. As time went on the Persian encroached increasingly upon the native Indian style, until the combination of the two brought into existence the Rajput and Mughal schools.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Huttemann, W., in Bassler Archiy, vol. 2, p. 2, 1913.
  2. Nahar, P., & Ghose, K., Epitome of Jainism, 1927.
  3. Shah, C J., Jainism in North India, pls. 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 14, 1932.
  4. Stchoukine, La peinture indienne a l'epoque des grands Moghols, 1928.
  5. Blochet, E., Musalman paining, xiith-xviith century, p. 52, London, 1929.

Discussed in this article

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.