Skip to content
Browse articles

धर्म और विज्ञान

By यशदेव शल्य

Vol. 48 · No. 01Janurary 2000pp. 9–12Hindi

Summary

The text discusses the relationship between dharma (religion/spirituality) and science, presenting them as two dimensions of human consciousness. Science is described as the dimension dealing with the sensory world and its practical applications, while dharma concerns the inner self and the divine principle. The author argues that various dimensions of human endeavor—such as poetry, art, philosophy, and craft—have their own internal standards of validity, and one dimension cannot judge another’s authenticity, except philosophy, which can only externally examine truth or falsity. The text uses examples like a scientist observing a religious claim about idols drinking milk, noting that the scientist can investigate physical causes but cannot deny the possibility of divine action. Similarly, Darwin’s theory of evolution provides a rational scientific framework but cannot refute religious claims of direct spiritual insight. The discussion references David Hume’s critique of science and religion, noting that Hume challenged the foundations of both, and Immanuel Kant’s attempt to defend science by grounding it in a priori structures of human consciousness. The text contrasts Western and Indian conceptions of God, stating that in Indian thought, God is immanent and not separate from the world, as seen in traditions like Advaita Vedanta and the Buddhist concept of tathāgatagarbha. It criticizes arguments against God’s existence based on lack of sensory evidence, noting that even physical matter is ultimately a matter of faith. The author concludes that calls for reconciling dharma and science are meaningless, comparing it to making yoga a branch of medical science.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

This discussion clarifies that the pursuit of a synthesis between religion and science is fundamentally misguided, as they operate within distinct, non-overlapping domains of human consciousness. The real intellectual labor lies not in forcing a false unity, but in recognizing the unique validity of each realm—science for the empirical world and religion for inner spiritual experience. The document’s key implication is that philosophy, not science or religion, serves as the necessary arbiter for examining the assumptions and boundaries of both. Ultimately, this perspective liberates each field from the burden of justifying itself to the other, allowing for a more honest and rigorous exploration of truth within its own proper sphere, free from the confusion of misplaced expectations.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “धर्म और विज्ञान के समन्वय को लेकर हमारे बौद्धिक વર્ગ में हो रही चर्चा में अलग-अलग मत सामने आते रहे हैं। लेकिन सामान्यतः यह समझ पाना जरा कठिन लगता रहा है कि धर्म और विज्ञान में क्या कोई समन्वय या संबंध विकसित હો सकता है?”
  • “इन सब आयामो के अपनी-अपनी प्रामाणिकता के अपने-अपने अंतरंग मानदंड होते हैं, एक आयाम दूसरे आयाम की प्रामाणिकता-अप्रामाणिकता का निर्धारण नहीं कर सकता--सिवाय दर्शन के।”

Works cited in this article

  1. सत्ताविषयक अन्वीक्षा
  2. मूल्यतत्त्व मीमांसा
  3. प्राकृतिक नियम ओर मानवीय अनियम
  4. महात्मा गांधी और हिन्दस्वराज
  5. भारतीय स्वतंत्रता संग्राम और मूल्य विमर्श

Discussed in this article

People

Texts & works

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by यशदेव शल्य

All articles →
Jain Bharati

दर्शन और उन्मीलन

By यशदेव शल्य

January - 2002
Jain Bharati

संस्कृति, शिक्षा ओर राजनीति

By यशदेव शल्य

November - 2000