Skip to content
Browse articles

The Doctrines of Mahavira

By Satya Ranjan Banerjee

Vol. 27 · No. 4April - 1993pp. 199–214English

Summary

Satya Ranjan Banerjee’s essay “The Doctrines of Mahāvīra” sets out to reappraise the life and teachings of Vardhamāna Mahāvīra, the 24th Jaina Tīrthaṅkara. The author situates Mahāvīra in the sixth century B.C., a time when spiritual teachers such as the Buddha, Zoroaster and Pythagoras were transforming human thought. Mahāvīra’s life story, reconstructed from the early traditions of both Jaina sects, begins with his birth near Vaiśālī to a kṣatriya family in 599 B.C. According to Banerjee and modern historians, he grew up in a world dominated by Brahmanical ritual and social hierarchy. At the age of thirty he renounced wealth and family, became a wandering ascetic and practised severe austerities for twelve years. During this period of meditation and non‑violence he endured physical abuse and cultivated compassion for all living beings. Ultimately he attained kevala‑jñāna, or omniscience, and spent the remaining thirty years of his life preaching his doctrine across the Ganga basin before achieving nirvāṇa at Pāvā in 527 B.C. The core of Mahāvīra’s message, Banerjee explains, is an ethical and philosophical revolution that challenged many assumptions of the Vedic tradition. He rejected the idea of a creator‑god and argued that the misery and inequality present in the world are the result of individual karma rather than divine will. This led him to criticise animal sacrifice, question the eternal validity of the Vedas and deny the permanence of the ātman; in its place he taught that reality is both permanent and changing and must be understood through anekāntavāda (non‑absolutism) and syādvāda, the doctrine of conditional predication. The essay shows how Mahāvīra’s insistence on ahiṃsā (non‑violence) went beyond the negative injunction not to harm but extended to positive virtues such as forgiveness, compassion, friendliness and joy. Mahāvīra thus offered a method for overcoming greed, anger and attachment through self‑discipline and meditation, culminating in the liberation of the soul. Banerjee situates Mahāvīra’s teachings within the wider religious and social context of ancient India. Unlike the monotheistic or fatalistic doctrines of the time, Jainism teaches that each soul can become liberated through its own efforts and that no outside creator can absolve karmic consequences. While acknowledging similarities with Buddhism, the author stresses that Jainism retained elements of the Hindu social order and always remained a primarily Indian faith. The essay ends by arguing that Mahāvīra’s principles of non‑violence, equality and self‑control remain relevant in the modern world. Banerjee believes that a proper understanding of these doctrines could mitigate the violence, greed and hatred that plague contemporary societies.

Summary reviewed by a volunteer editor.

Conclusion

Banerjee concludes that Mahāvīra’s intellectual legacy lies not in metaphysical speculation but in a practical ethic of non‑violence and self‑restraint. By renouncing worldly attachments and mastering his senses, Mahāvīra demonstrated that every soul can purify itself and attain omniscience through sincere effort. His rejection of sacrifice, caste privilege and divine creation challenged the foundations of Vedic society and inspired a spiritual democracy that values all life. The essay suggests that the relevance of Mahāvīra’s message endures today: universal compassion and personal discipline remain powerful antidotes to social violence and moral decay.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “Mahavira’s contribution towards the religious development of mankind is a great landmark and unparalleled in many ways in the annals of human history.”
  • “The basic tenets of Jainism are found in the epithets by which Mahavira is often described.”
  • “The Jina is, therefore, the divine person (sarvajia) who lived in the world with his body, and it refers to the period after attaining sarvajiia-hood and the last period of the parinirvina, when the body is cast away and the self resumes its own intrinsic pure spiritual nature and it becomes paramdatmd or siddha.”

Works cited in this article

  1. H. L. Jhaveri, The First Principles of the Jaina Philosophy, London, 1910
  2. J. L. Jain, Outlines of Jainism, p. xxvii-viii
  3. M. Winternitz, History of Indian Literature, Vol. I, Calcutta, p. 44f
  4. Chakravarti, Samayasara, p. 81

Discussed in this article

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Satya Ranjan Banerjee

All articles →
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Jain Theory of Multiple Facets of Reality and Truth (Book Review)

By Satya Ranjan Banerjee

July - June 2010-2011
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Jain Society in the Reign of Jain Kings

By Satya Ranjan Banerjee

April - 2008
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Contribution of the Jains in Developing Moral Fibres of the Indians

By Satya Ranjan Banerjee

January - 2008
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Contributions of the Jains to the Vaiśeṣika Philosophy

By Satya Ranjan Banerjee

October - 2007