Skip to content
Browse articles

Jaina Plural Perspective: A Handy Resource to the Ministry of Dialogue and Reconciliation

By Vincent Sekhar

Vol. 38 · No. 3January - 2004pp. 131–144English

Summary

The article begins by exploring the interdependent relationship between religion and society. Using sociologist Otto Maduro's analysis as a framework, Vincent Sekhar argues that the social structure influences the form that religious or moral activity takes, and that religion in turn shapes society. Religious rituals and celebrations create social solidarity and motivate communities to work toward harmony and welfare. Sekhar suggests that while religions can unite people, they also possess an ambiguous role in class or caste societies because religion can be used by dominant groups to protect their interests. To address these tensions the article promotes a pluralistic perspective rooted in Jain philosophy. The author notes that all major religions acknowledge a single ultimate reality and emphasise compassion, yet exclusivist claims cause conflict. For example, Catholic, Islamic and Hindu texts sometimes assert absolute religious supremacy. The article juxtaposes these exclusivist assertions with teachings from various traditions that encourage humility and pluralism. The Buddhist Suttanipāta warns against attachment to one’s own viewpoint, the Jain and Buddhist parable of the blind men and the elephant shows that no single person grasps the whole truth, and the Bahā’ī writings state that all religions derive inspiration from one divine source. Confucius likewise observed that there may be many roads, but the destination is one. Such teachings support the Jain doctrine of anekānta (non‑absolutism) and syādvāda (conditional predication), which recognise that truth has multiple facets. The article critiques fundamentalism and exclusivism as narrow affirmations of truth that lead to intolerance, revivalism and violence. Fundamentalism arises from a need for identity and certainty, but it often manifests as insistence that one’s own faith is uniquely correct and others are inferior. Sekhar argues that this attitude leads to discrimination, social unrest and even terrorism. He contrasts this with Jainism’s emphasis on non‑violence (ahimsā), compassion and respect for all living beings. The Jain ethic views every being as possessing a life‑force and therefore deserving of care; it encourages adherents to treat all viewpoints with openness. In this way Jain pluralism offers a constructive framework for inter‑religious dialogue, mutual understanding and the formation of a “New Humanity.” By promoting tolerance and ethical living, Jain pluralism becomes a handy resource for ministries and organisations engaged in dialogue and reconciliation between different faiths.

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

The article concludes that adopting a Jain plural perspective can help heal divisions in today’s pluralistic societies. By recognising that different religions are varied expressions of a single truth and by practising non‑violence, compassion and anekānta, communities can move beyond fundamentalism and exclusivist claims. The author argues that the Jain emphasis on seeing things from multiple viewpoints nurtures humility and mutual respect, which are essential for meaningful dialogue. This pluralistic ethic not only enriches inter‑religious understanding but also fosters social harmony, justice and peace. The article suggests that religious leaders and policymakers should draw on Jain values to build a more inclusive and reconciled world.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “Religions play at times an ambiguous role in class/caste society. But the same religion has a moral force to unite its followers under several banners.”
  • “Building up a New Humanity and creating a New Environment seems to be the major aim of all religions. But every religion has its own focus and basic ethos.”
  • “Such and other Exclusivists claims-their religion/ideology is unique/superior and all other revelations are secondary and inadequate-have caused conflicts and violence in religious history.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Otto Maduro : Religion and Social Conflicts, (trans.) from the Spanish by Robert R. Barr. Orbis Books, Maryknoll, New York, 1982, p. 41-43, 66-67, 75-77
  2. World Scripture - A Comparative Anthology of Sacred Texts, A Project of the International Religious Foundation, Edited by Andrew Wilson, Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Private Limited, Delhi, First Indian Edition, 1993
  3. Geoffrey Parrinder: The Bhagavad Gita- A Versc Translation, Sheldon Press, London, 1974, p. 53

Discussed in this article

People

Places

Texts & works

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Vincent Sekhar

All articles →
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Jaina Dharma: A Little Known Faith For Deeper Understanding and Enriching Life

By Vincent Sekhar

April - 2003
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

“Give Away Violence, Preserve Life”: Contemporary Call of the Śramaṇa Religions

By Vincent Sekhar

April - 2000
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

The Śramaṇa Response to the Human Predicament

By Vincent Sekhar

October - 1998
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

The Human Person from Jaina and Buddhist Perspectives

By Vincent Sekhar

October - 1995