Skip to content
Browse articles

The 'Primitive' in the Kautilya's Arthasastra

By Ganesh Thite

Vol. 3 · No. 4January - 1975pp. 89–100English

Summary

Ganesh Thite’s essay surveys the numerous ‘primitive’ elements—magic rites, superstitions and folklore—in Kautilya’s *Arthaśāstra*. Although the *Arthaśāstra* is famed as a sophisticated manual on politics and economics, it contains prescriptions for magical practices aimed at procuring success or averting calamities. The author notes that the work lists magico‑religious rites to ensure safe journeys and protection from enemies; for example, after fasting on Puṣya day one should sew barley seeds into the skull of a man killed with a weapon, sprinkle them with sheep’s milk, and wear a garland of barley sprouts to become invisible. Similar rites involve anointing the eyes with powders of owl’s fat or cat’s eye, carrying powders in a camel‑shaped vessel and using bone marrow or semen of various animals to walk hundreds of yojanas without fatigue. The essay also describes rites for making enemies sleep or suffer calamities: burying black magic powders at an enemy’s gate can make everyone in the village fall asleep; offering human flesh in a funeral pyre while reciting mantras can destroy enemies. Kautilya prescribes sorcery to cause epidemics, famine, rats or worms in an enemy’s territory; he even suggests burning a wooden doll to produce the same effect as lightning. To avert disasters like fire, flood and drought, the king is advised to perform worship of fire, rivers and mountains and to make oblations and offerings. Scholars have debated whether these passages are original to Kautilya or later interpolations influenced by Tantric literature. The author notes that primitive beliefs are found throughout Vedic and post‑Vedic literature, so their presence in the *Arthaśāstra* is not surprising. While some think the magic sections are spurious, Thite suggests they reflect the socio‑religious milieu of ancient India, where statecraft co‑existed with ritual and superstition. The essay argues that appreciating these ‘primitive’ elements helps us understand the complex cultural context in which the *Arthaśāstra* was compiled. By surveying the work’s magical recipes and superstitious rites, the author reveals a dimension of Kautilya’s treatise that is often overlooked. The essay invites scholars to consider how political thought in ancient India incorporated ritual practices and beliefs that modern readers may find irrational.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

The article concludes that the *Arthaśāstra*, despite its rational reputation, contains many prescriptions for magic and superstition. These passages may be later insertions, but they also testify to the pervasive influence of ritual and folklore in ancient Indian culture. Recognising the coexistence of sophisticated statecraft and ‘primitive’ beliefs enhances our understanding of the text and encourages scholars to study the cultural syncretism of the period.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “The magico-religious rites prescribed in the Kausillya Artha-Sastra are to be perfomed for the sake of geiting a favourable son, removing the calamities like over-rains or drought, posse ssing some superhuman powers like that of walking on fire or of walking incessantly fora very long distance etc.”
  • “The magic 1s often inseparably muxed with region Therefore we get numerous references to obeisance to gods, worship of gods, offerings to be paid to them etc Aims etc. of magico religions rites .”
  • “Kautilya 1s supposed to be very shrewd ( Aujilamani )and intellhgent Then it may be asked how then in his work there 18 $0 much of “primitive” ?”

Works cited in this article

  1. RP, KANGLE’s The Kaujilipa Arthaitsira-Ll, Bombay, 1963
  2. Cl. M. WINTERNITZ, Some Problems of Indian Literature, Calcutta, 1925
  3. C V.R Ramachandra Dikshitar, “ The Religious data i Kavtly Arthasistra” 1.7, 1929, (P, 251ff) p. 251, 253 ete

Discussed in this article

People

Dynasties, sects & groups

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Ganesh Thite

All articles →
Sambodhi

Ajnapatra and Sanskrit Works on Polity-A Comparison

By Ganesh Thite

April 1980 - January 1981
Sambodhi

Sāmrajyalakṣmipīṭhikā or Akāśabhairavakalpa – A Tantrik Encyclopaedia of Magicoreligion

By Ganesh Thite

April - 1978 to January - 1979
Sambodhi

Antipathy to the Rājasūya: Why?

By Ganesh Thite

October - 1972
Sambodhi

Antipathy to the Rajasoya why?

By Ganesh Thite

October 1972