Skip to content
Browse articles

Did Castana start the Saka era

By Rasesh Jamindar

Vol. 1 · No. 4January 1973pp. 31–35English

Summary

The origin of the Śaka Era (78 AD) has long been a debated issue in Indian historiography, with various scholars proposing different founders. Early theories suggested that rulers like Vonones, Nahapāna, or even the Kuṣāṇa king Kaniṣka were responsible, but each theory faced serious limitations. Vonones was a Parthian, not a Śaka; Nahapāna was defeated by Gautamīputra Śātakarṇi and had no lasting era; and Kaniṣka, though powerful, was not of Śaka origin, and no direct evidence links him to the founding of the era. The theory that Cāṣṭana, a Western Kṣatrapa and of Śaka origin, started the era is increasingly considered the most plausible. His dynasty used the era, his independence from the Kuṣāṇas is now recognized, and his coins and inscriptions show no imitation of Kuṣāṇa style. Recent inscriptions also date his reign to around 78 AD, supporting the idea that he initiated the era to commemorate his victories and establish a legacy. Thus, based on ethnicity, chronology, independence, and inscriptional evidence, the theory that Cāṣṭana was the founder of the Śaka Era is seen as the most logical and historically sound.

Summary reviewed by a volunteer editor.

Conclusion

The Śaka Era's origin is most convincingly attributed to Cāṣṭana, supported by solid evidence of his independence, ethnic background, and chronological consistency with inscriptions from around 78 AD. This theory overcomes previous limitations and provides a historically coherent explanation for the era's inception.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “But, even then, I think it Is desirable to discuss few of those argttmeatf for showing their limitations and make new propositions regarding thit en”
  • “I now here Intend to maintain very positively that the Casiana was the real originator of the &aka era for the following reasons”
  • “In the end let me conclude with by saying tbat this is the most riopk, most natural, most convincing and the most logical theory this Author bM put forth before the world of scholars to consider and comment upon that the Caitana was responsible to start this Saka Era m the pieteot tfete of oar knowledge”

Works cited in this article

  1. JBBRAS, Vol ix, 1902, pp 270ff
  2. IA. 1908, pp 25ff
  3. Bom Gaz Vol. uv, p 6S7
  4. Umeshanmlira CojnmemoratiQn Volume, 1970, pp 703 ff
  5. Kalhana's Rajatar.iigiBi (I, 170)

Discussed in this article

Places

Dynasties, sects & groups

  • Western Ksatrapas

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Rasesh Jamindar

All articles →
Sambodhi

SURYOPASANA IN THE PRE-AHMEDABAD SOCIETY

By Rasesh Jamindar

2007
Sambodhi

Historical perspective on some contemporary historical events

By Rasesh Jamindar

2002
Sambodhi

Reviews

By Rasesh Jamindar

2001
Sambodhi

યક્ષપક્ષ આગણો : ઐતિહાસિક વિશ્લેષણ

By Rasesh Jamindar

2001