Skip to content
Browse articles

Did Strato I strike barbarous Coins?

By Amarendra Nath Lahiri

Vol. 35 · No. 2June - 1959pp. 167–170English

Summary

This numismatic note revisits the question of whether the Indo‑Greek king Strato I was responsible for issuing crude, so‑called ‘barbarous’ drachms. The debate originated with Cunningham, who discovered a series of very crude drachms depicting a diademed bust and the goddess Pallas hurling a thunderbolt and noted that the name ‘Straton’ appears twice in the Greek legends. From this and from the new title ‘Priyapita’ (Kharosthi: priyapita) on the reverse, Cunningham proposed the existence of a second Strato. Gardner accepted two Stratos, while Rapson later restored both the Greek and Kharosthi legends and re‑examined the evidence. The present article analyses three distinct series of coins. Series I consists of well‑executed drachms with a realistic bust of a youthful king and Greek legends reading ‘Basileos Soteros Stratonos’; these coins are rare and carry only Greek monograms. Series II comprises drachms of barbarous style showing a crudely depicted old man and the figure of Pallas with Greek legends similar to series I and Kharosthi legends reading ‘Maharajasa tratarasa Stratasa’. Series III includes coins with corrupt Greek legends restored by Rapson as ‘Basileos Soteros Stratonos Kai Philopatoros’ and Kharosthi legends with the epithet ‘Priyapita’; these coins are stylistically identical to series II. The article argues that series II and III were struck in the same region by the same authority, as indicated by the identical bust, figure of Pallas, monograms and execution. These crude coins have misled scholars into believing that Strato’s reign was very long, for the portraits depict him as a man of more than seventy years with toothless jaws and sunken cheeks. However, Strato I is otherwise known to have issued well‑made tetradrachms and drachms depicting him from youth to middle age. The article therefore doubts that Strato I himself struck these barbarous coins. Instead, they were probably local imitations or later issues produced by unskilled artists; Rapson’s title ‘Priyapita’ may have been a later honorific rather than evidence for a second king. Strato I adopted at least three epithets—Soter (saviour), Dikaios (just) and Epiphanes (manifest)—during his career. The article concludes that caution is needed in using barbarous coins to reconstruct the chronology of Indo‑Greek rulers.

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

The study concludes that the crude drachms bearing Strato’s name, previously attributed to a second Strato or to an aged Strato I, were more likely local imitations struck by unskilled artists. Properly executed coins show Strato adopting different epithets and portray him from youth to middle age. Thus, the barbarous coins cannot extend Strato I’s reign or justify duplicating him. The article cautions numismatists against basing historical reconstructions on crude imitative coinage.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “From this as well 85 from the occurrence 00 the reverse of *‘the new title Priyapita, which is a perfect translation of the Greek Philopator,” he arrived at the conclusion that there was a second Strato,”
  • “It 15 thus clear thac in the third or the last stage of his carcer Strato 1 adopted the more high-sounding epithet Epiphanés in place of Dikaios.”
  • “A rule for over 50 years for Strato 1 15 highly improbable.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Cunningham, The Coins of Alexander's Successors in the East, 1873, ch. 257
  2. Gardner. Catalogue of the coins of the Greek and Scythic Kings of Bactria and India in the British Museum, 1886, pp. xxxv and 168
  3. Rapson, “Coins of the Graeco-Indian Sovereigns, Agathocleia, Strato I Soter and Strato II Philopator”, Corolla Numismatica, 1906, pp. 245

Discussed in this article

People

Places

Texts & works

  • PMC
  • NC 1948
  • BMC
  • Corolla Numismatica

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Amarendra Nath Lahiri

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Attribution of the Apollodotus Coins

By Amarendra Nath Lahiri

Mar-58
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Diodotus Coins

By Amarendra Nath Lahiri

September - 1957
The Indian Historical Quarterly

When did Demetrius invade India?

By Amarendra Nath Lahiri

March - 1957