Browse articles

The Jaina Empirical Theory of Perception

By Pushpa Bothra

No. 3Jan 1967pp. 111 - 116English

Summary

The Jaina theory of empirical perception, rooted in the belief that the soul is inherently omniscient and possesses infinite knowledge, states that knowledge is veiled due to karma. This knowledge is perfect only when the veil of karma is removed. The classification of knowledge among Jain scholars varies, with an older division into mati and sruta. However, a more refined classification includes pratyaksa (direct perception) and paroksa (indirect perception), though opinions differ on what qualifies under each. Pratyaksa is further divided into mukhya (non-sensuous) and samvyavaharika (empirical) perception. Hemacandra, in his Pramana Mimamsa, defines pratyaksa as clear, or visada knowledge. Unlike other forms of knowledge, perception is independent and reveals its object with specific qualities. It is divided into mukhya (direct knowledge from the self) and samvyavaharika (empirical, sense perception). The latter relies on the senses and mind, which serve as the instrumental causes of perception. Hemacandra refutes the notion that pratyaksa is always superior to paroksa, noting that inference often leads to perception, and vice versa. In the Jaina framework, the sense organs (dravyendriya) and the mind (manas) are essential for perception. The mind, defined as the organ of apprehension, is not limited by the specific qualities of the sense organs, enabling it to perceive all objects. The sense organs have a physical aspect (dravyendriya) and a psychical aspect (bhavendriya). The latter has two capacities: labdhi (manifestation of sense experience) and upayoga (the activity of the soul to produce knowledge). These capacities enable the mind to grasp sense data and participate in knowledge acquisition. Empirical knowledge proceeds through four stages: 1. Avagraha: A primitive state of indeterminate sensation resulting from the sense-object contact. 2. Iha: Intellectual analysis, where doubt about the object’s nature is resolved through conceptual thinking. 3. Avaya: Clear cognition, where the object’s nature is fully discerned. 4. Dharana: Retention of knowledge, enabling memory and recognition of objects over time. Jaina theory posits that these stages are necessary for complete perception, where retention (dharana) is essential for any perception, as it combines both presentation and representation of the object. This theory aligns with the Jaina philosophical understanding that knowledge is not merely a passive experience but a complex process of interaction between the senses, mind, and the self, revealing objects in their specific characteristics through a defined intellectual process. Note: The Jaina perspective on dharana suggests that memory retention is fundamental for all perception, based on the idea that every perception requires both direct experience and the ability to recall past experiences, ensuring continuity in cognition.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Jaina theory of empirical perception emphasizes the interplay between the senses, mind, and soul in acquiring knowledge. It asserts that while the soul inherently possesses omniscience, knowledge is obscured by karma. The theory divides perception into mukhya and samvyavaharika, with the latter being the empirical perception arising through the senses and mind. The process of perception involves four stages—avagraha, iha, avaya, and dharana—culminating in clear cognition and memory retention. Jaina epistemology asserts that perception is both a direct and intellectual process, with memory playing a crucial role in enabling continuous knowledge acquisition. This comprehensive view reflects the Jain understanding of knowledge as a dynamic interaction between the self and its instruments of perception.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.