Śāntā’s Parentage
Summary
Asoke Chatterjee investigates the contradictory traditions regarding Śāntā, the wife of the sage Ṛśyaśṛṅga and a prominent character in the Rāmāyaṇa. In the South Indian recension of the epic, the king Daśaratha of Ayodhyā is described as childless, and Śāntā is the daughter of his friend Lomapāda, king of Aṅga; Daśaratha brings Śāntā and Ṛśyaśṛṅga to Ayodhyā to perform the pūtreṣṭi sacrifice. In contrast, the North Indian recension states that Śāntā was the daughter of Daśaratha who was given in adoption to Lomapāda. The article surveys Puranic literature and later retellings to trace how these variants evolved. Several major works—including the Viṣṇupurāṇa, Skanda‑purāṇa and the Pañcāla‑khaṇḍa of the Padma‑purāṇa—support the northern tradition that Daśaratha gave his daughter to Lomapāda. Later authors such as Bhavabhūti in his Uttararāmacarita and Kṛttivāsa in his Bengali Rāmāyaṇa follow this version. Scholars like S.K. Belvalkar have also inclined towards the northern view. Chatterjee critiques this tradition by pointing out anomalies: the northern recensions call Śāntā the “dearest daughter” of Daśaratha but never mention her mother or the time of her birth. Moreover, all recensions agree that Daśaratha sought Lomapāda’s permission to bring Ṛśyaśṛṅga to Ayodhyā more consistent with a father‑in‑law than with a mere recipient of a foster daughter. The South Indian tradition describes Daśaratha as “anapatya” (childless) rather than “aputra” (without sons), suggesting he had no children at all at the time. Chatterjee therefore concludes that Śāntā was originally Lomapāda’s daughter. He proposes that the adoption story was a later interpolation intended to link the royal houses of Kosala and Aṅga and to provide Daśaratha with a daughter for narrative symmetry. By disentangling these textual layers, the article underscores the need to distinguish between early and late strata within the Rāmāyaṇa tradition.
AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.
Conclusion
Chatterjee convincingly argues that the earliest tradition portrays Śāntā as the natural daughter of Lomapāda. The northern recensions that depict her as Daśaratha’s adopted child are inconsistent: they lavish affection on her yet omit any mention of her mother or birth. By comparing Purāṇic accounts and analysing the language used to describe Daśaratha’s childlessness, the article shows that the adoption story is a later accretion. Accepting the South Indian version restores coherence to the narrative and sheds light on how political motivations shaped textual variations.