Skip to content
Browse articles

Mingling of Islamic and Indigenous Traditions in Indian Music

By Kaumudi

Vol. 26 · No. 2June - 1950pp. 129–137English
Indian Classical Music

Summary

In this essay the author charts how Islamic musical traditions blended with indigenous Indian music to create the composite Hindustani tradition. The narrative begins with the Arab conquest of Sindh in the 8th century and the subsequent establishment of Turkish and Mughal dynasties in North India. Medieval Muslim writers such as al‑Jāḥiẓ and al‑Masʿūdī admired Indian music, and the Sufi acceptance of music as a path to God allowed Muslim rulers and nobles to patronise this art. During the reigns of Sultan Ala‑ud‑din Khilji and the later Mughal emperors, Hindu court musicians were employed in imperial workshops, and Persian, Afghan and Kashmiri musicians interacted with Indian counterparts. The essay quotes the 14th‑century poet Amir Khusrow, who was proficient in Persian and Indian music and proclaimed Indian music superior to that of other countries. Following Khusrow, Muslim musicians took an active interest in Indian music and enriched the repertoire by inventing new rāgas, tālas and musical forms as well as modifying instruments. At the Mughal courts of Akbar, Jahāngīr and Shāh Jahān, legendary Indian maestros such as Swami Haridas and Tansen flourished under royal patronage. Indian music was most favoured even though Persian and Afghan musicians were also present. The article analyses how Islamic influence de‑emphasised Sanskrit lyrics and devotional content in favour of songs in Hindi dialects, Braj Bhāṣā, Bhojpuri, Dakhani and Urdu. Sufi and Bhakti movements shared a devotional emphasis that softened orthodox opposition to music and fostered new genres such as qawwālī and dhrupad. The essay emphasises that the Mughal period saw the development of khayāl and thumrī, forms that allowed improvisation and ornamentation. It points out that the shift to vernacular lyrics broadened the audience and allowed poetry about human love to serve as allegory for divine love. The mingling of traditions also extended to instruments: the Persian setār evolved into the sitār, and the rabāb influenced the sarod. The author concludes that Islamic influence, though pronounced in North India, did not displace older traditions. Rather, the Mughal courts provided space where Hindu and Muslim musicians collaborated, leading to a hybrid style that forms the basis of modern Hindustani classical music. By tracing historical evidence and musical forms, the article illustrates how cultural exchange can produce enduring artistic syntheses rather than cultural domination.

Summary reviewed by a volunteer editor.

Conclusion

The conclusion stresses that Muslim patronage changed Indian music by introducing new scales, forms and instruments but did not erase indigenous aesthetics. Sufi acceptance of music enabled Muslim rulers to support Hindu musicians, and the resulting fusion created the Hindustani tradition. The vernacularisation of lyrics and the adoption of Persian instruments expanded the repertoire and audience. The author argues that this synthesis exemplifies India’s ability to assimilate influences while retaining its core identity, and he calls for recognising the shared heritage of Muslim and Hindu contributions to the subcontinent’s musical heritage.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “Arts and litera-ture thus flourished and social and ‘cultural’ movements revived though in a synthetic form. This unity or synthesis of the two cultures was, per-haps, nowhere more evident that in the sphere of song and melody which in their form and expression became partly Muslim and partly Hindu.”
  • “Amir Khusraw, it might be of interest to mention here, was of Turkish descent. His father, Amir Sayfuddin Mahmud, -was a Turk who had fled from his homeland in Bokhara when the Mongols invaded that country.”
  • “The Emperor, as Abul Fazl tells us,-was a gteat lover of ‘music and also a good ‘player on the Nakkarah (kettle drum).”

Works cited in this article

  1. Al-Biruni, India (tre. by, Sachau), Introduction.
  2. Francesco Salvadcr-Daniel, the: Music and Musical Instruments of the Arab, pp. 174-186.
  3. Lane, Modern Egyptians (quoted from Francesco Salvador-Daniel, The Music and Musical Instraments of the Arab, pp. 174-175).
  4. Shankar Rao Shiva Ram: Sangit Candrodaya.
  5. Browne, E.G.: A History of Persian Literature, vel, IIT. (1265-1502 A.D.).

Discussed in this article

People

Places

  • Bokhara
  • Patyali

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Continue reading

Related articles

Jain Bharati

संगीत : मन के पार आत्मा तक पहुंचने का मार्ग

May - 2009
Jain Bharati

संगीत : आत्मानुभूति का उत्कृष्ट रूप

October - 2012
Journal of Indian History and Culture

Ṣaḍaṅga Theory in Rāgamālā Paintings

By Aarti Iyer

December 2023