Skip to content
Browse articles

Select Contents of Oriental Journals

Vol. 24 · No. 3September - 1948pp. 247–248English

Summary

This section summarises notable articles published in recent issues of various Oriental journals, offering readers a digest of current research in archaeology, linguistics, history and religious studies. From the Bulletin of the Archaeological Survey of India it notes V. Gordon Childe’s paper on megalithic monuments of India, which compares stone circles and dolmens found in India, Iran, the Caucasus and the Mediterranean and discusses their classification and distribution. N. P. Chakravarti analyses minor rock‑edicts of Aśoka and related problems of dating. Stuart Piggott reports on metal pins and mace‑heads from the Harappan culture, while A. Ghosh summarises excavations at Sirkap, describing structures, pottery, terracotta and coins from the Maurya and Śuṅga strata. R. E. M. Wheeler contributes lectures on India in pre‑Islamic times and on megalithic and other cultures in Mysore. V. S. Agrawala writes on terracotta figurines of Ahicchatra. The section then lists papers from Bhāratīya Vidyā, Brahmavidyā and other journals. P. K. Gode examines the mosquito‑net in Egypt and India, using literary and archaeological evidence to argue for a continuity of mosquito nets in India from 500 BCE to 1800 CE. H. C. Bhayani studies the language of Gujarat from earliest times to 1300 CE. P. C. Divanji translates and comments on the Brhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad’s Kenopaniṣad. K. Madhava Krishna Sarma discusses the devotional poem Ānandabhairavi by Āśānanda. A symposium on the language problem in India records debates on whether Tamil, Hindi, English or Sanskrit should serve as national languages. The Quarterly Journal of the Mythic Society features K. Krishnamurthy’s study of Abhinavagupta’s contribution to the theory of dhvani and V. G. Sivatil’s paper on the interpretation of Aryan and aboriginal cultures with special reference to the Sora tribe. Sino‑Indian Studies publishes an article by Dschi Han‑lin on the oldest Chinese translations of the name Buddha, arguing that the Chinese Fo is derived from an Indian prakrit form, and another by Walter Liebenthal on a Sanskrit inscription from Yünnan that sheds light on contacts between Bengal and Yünnan monasteries. P. C. Baggi writes on the geographical catalogue of Yakṣas in the Mahāmāyūrī mantra‑bhadra, while a note from Pali scholars points out an encyclopaedic work on law (Dharmasaṅgraha). By presenting this collection of abstracts, the section enables readers to keep abreast of research trends without consulting each journal individually. The range of topics—from megalithic archaeology and Aśokan edicts to Chinese translations and Yakṣa catalogues—illustrates the vitality and interdisciplinary nature of Oriental studies in the mid‑twentieth century.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

The digest of journal contents underscores the breadth of scholarship appearing in Oriental studies. It spans archaeology, linguistics, folklore, textual criticism and comparative religion, drawing from Indian, Iranian, Chinese and Southeast Asian contexts. By showcasing highlights from diverse publications, the editors foster cross‑pollination of ideas and encourage readers to explore unfamiliar subjects. The section affirms that the study of the ancient world thrives when specialists share findings across disciplinary and regional boundaries.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “The present paper deals wich ‘the international problems’ of their ‘classification and disteibution’.”
  • “The city of Taxtla in course of time had changed 'three successive but adjacent sites: (Bhir Mound, Sickap, and Sirsukh)'.”
  • “The conclusion reached in che paper is that the word Fou-t'u originated from an Indian (Prakrit) form of the name Buddha, while the word Fo came through the medium of Kuchean broughe later to China by the Central Asian monks.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Anoient India (Bulletin of the Archaeological Survey of India), No. 4
  2. Bharatiya Vidya, vol. VIII, no, 12
  3. Brabmavidya, vol. XII, part 4
  4. Quarterly Journal of the Mythic Society, vol, XXXVIII, No. 4
  5. Stno-Indian Studies, vol. III, pts. 1 & 2

Discussed in this article

People

  • P. Cuakravartt
  • Stuart Piccot
  • GHosH
  • E. M. Wueecer
  • S. AcrawaLa
  • K, Gope
  • C. Buavanit
  • P. C. Divanjr
  • K. Mapuava Kaisuna SarMa

Places

  • Taxila (Sirkap)
  • Bhir Mound
  • Sirsukh

Texts & works

  • Brahmagiri and Candravalli

Dynasties, sects & groups

  • Soras (Savaras)

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Continue reading

Related articles

The Indian Historical Quarterly

Select Contents of Oriental Journals

By U. N. Ghoshal

June - 1948
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Select Contents of Oriental Journals

June - 1932
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Select Contents of Oriental Journals

March 1951
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Books on Jainology

By Cidananda, A. B. Dhruva

October 1968
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Well‑wishes

By Dalsukh D. Malvania

July - 1991
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Select Contents of Oriental Journals

March - 1931