Skip to content
Browse articles

A Prakrit Tendency in Rgveda

By A. M. Ghatage

Vol. 21 · No. 3September - 1945pp. 223–226English, Sanskrit

Summary

A Prakrit Tendency in Rgveda is a linguistic note exploring how features characteristic of Middle Indo-Aryan languages are foreshadowed in the ancient Rigveda. Though often treated as a monolithic sacred language, the Rigveda reveals influences from contemporary spoken dialects. The author highlights the weakening or loss of final consonants (especially -s and -m) in forms like ittha/ittham and katha/katham, drawing parallels with Prakrit forms (e.g., kahā) and even Latin, where final -m became faint in pronunciation. He notes that the Padapatha and Samhita versions of Rigvedic verses sometimes diverge, with sandhi reductions or elisions that suggest assimilation processes akin to those in Prakrit. Examples include phrases where nasal or aspirate sounds disappear, or where consonant clusters are simplified. The note also discusses the interchange of dental and retroflex sounds and the merging of voiced and voiceless consonants—developments that later define the Prakrits. These observations imply that the Rigveda, while archaic, was influenced by living speech. Recognising this continuity helps linguists refine the chronology of phonological change and bridge the gap between Old Indo-Aryan and Middle Indo-Aryan. The article invites philologists to re-examine Rigvedic sandhi, morphology and metre for further evidence of vernacular influence, suggesting that the evolution of Indo-Aryan languages was gradual and already underway in the Vedic period."

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

The note concludes that certain Prakrit-like phonetic and morphological traits—such as final consonant weakening and simplification of clusters—are observable in the Rigveda, demonstrating continuity between Vedic Sanskrit and later vernaculars. Recognising these tendencies helps trace linguistic evolution and underscores the influence of spoken dialects on the sacred text.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “We hope to find such a Prakritic tendency in the present Samhita of Rgveda incidentally preserved though in a limited number of cases.”
  • “We are thus [૯૯ to the conclusion that in all these cases, RV. and occasionally some later Vedic works know of an alternative form in -d to the Neuter sing. form in -am, in conformity with a well known Prakrit tendency, probably a result of ‘the spoken dialect influencing the Vedic language.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Ghosh, Indian Linguistics. VII, 54-57; IX, 30-37.
  2. M. Katre, Prakrit Languages, pp. 65-78 mainly 98500 on Wackernagel and Vedic Variants.
  3. Sanskrit 0760700007, 213, h. 4 K. Beitr. 4, 208..
  4. Wartburg: FEvolution et structure de la langue {rancaise, pp. 40-41.
  5. Jacobi: Bhuvisattakahu, 60; Alsdorf: BSOS, ૪1, 829 foll.

Discussed in this article

Texts & works

Dynasties, sects & groups

  • Prakrits

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by A. M. Ghatage

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Title Dasavaikalika Sutra

By A. M. Ghatage

September - 1938
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Instrumental and Locative in Ardha-Magadhi

By A. M. Ghatage

March - 1937
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Sutrakrtanga-niryukti

By A. M. Ghatage

June - 1936
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Dasavaikalika-Niryukti

By A. M. Ghatage

December - 1935