Skip to content
Browse articles

The Constitution of the Licchavis of Vaisali

By U. N. Ghoshal

Vol. 20 · No. 4December - 1944pp. 334–340English

Summary

U. N. Ghoshal investigates the constitutional structure of the Licchavi republic of Vaiśālī, a city famed in Buddhist literature. His starting point is a controversial passage from the Ekapaṇṇa Jātaka describing how seven thousand seven hundred and seven kings governed the city, assisted by an equal number of viceroys, generals and treasurers. Earlier scholars, particularly K. P. Jayaswal, interpreted this as evidence that Vaiśālī had a four‑member cabinet composed of a president, vice‑president, commander‑in‑chief and chancellor, implying a quasi‑monarchical structure. Ghoshal subjects the Sanskrit and Pāli texts to close philological scrutiny. He argues that Jayaswal’s addition of words absent from manuscripts and his conjectural translation distort the original sense. The phrase ‘the people themselves, seven thousand seven hundred and seven kings’ refers to a large assembly of clan elders who collectively held sovereignty and from whom executive officers were selected. Rather than a cabinet of four permanent officials, there appears to have been a wider council and a rotating presidency. Ghoshal compares this with descriptions of the Vajjian confederacy in Buddhist canon and argues that the Licchavis practised a unique form of oligarchic republic in which multiple families shared power. He also examines terms like upa‑rajan and senāpati in other texts and inscriptions to show that their functions differed from the modern notions of vice‑president or general. By situating the Licchavis within the broader context of republican polities in ancient India, Ghoshal challenges monarchical interpretations and underscores the diversity of Indian political institutions. He concludes that the Licchavi constitution was essentially federal and that later commentaries which inflate the number of officers reflect legendary embellishment rather than historical reality.

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

Ghoshal’s careful philological work demonstrates that the Licchavi state was not a monarchy but a complex republic governed by a broad assembly of ruling families. His article cautions against uncritical acceptance of late Jātaka commentaries and invites scholars to revisit early textual evidence to understand India’s republican traditions.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • ““The rule (rajjam) vested in चाट inhabiwnts (vasantinam), 7707 m number, all of whom were entitled to rule (r3jinam, ‘kings’).”
  • “What the Jataka means to say 15 that the 7707 of the inhabitants, probably the foundation families, were the ruling class, thac it is they who became (9074, ‘become’) the executive office-holders.””

Works cited in this article

  1. The Ekapanpa Jataka (No. 149)
  2. Chalmers, Further Dialogues of the Buddha, I, 165
  3. Corporate Life in Ancient India
  4. Lectures on the Ancient History of India of the period from 650 to 325 B.C.

Discussed in this article

Texts & works

  • Cullakalinga Jataka
  • Ekapanpa Jataka

Dynasties, sects & groups

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by U. N. Ghoshal

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Two aspects of Law and Politics in the Indian State

By U. N. Ghoshal

Mar-58
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Review: Caulukyas of Gujarat

By U. N. Ghoshal

March - 1957
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Purana Stories of Vena and Prithu and their Philosophical Significance

By U. N. Ghoshal

December - 1956
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Principle of the King's Righteousness

By U. N. Ghoshal

June & September 1956