Skip to content
Browse articles

Krsna Deva Raya’s economic policy

By Y. Venkataramana

Vol. 17 · No. 1March - 1941pp. 97–103English

Summary

The article examines the economic policy of the Vijayanagara emperor Krsna Deva Raya, arguing that he was a great economist who blended ancient Hindu economic principles with practical governance to ensure the welfare of his people and the soundness of his treasury. The main sources discussed are the contemporary evidence of Raysvacams and the autobiographical Amuktamalyada, particularly the 4th canto where Yamunaprabhu instructs his son on state policy. The author, Y. Venkataramana, corroborates these texts with numerous inscriptions from Bellary, Salem, and Cuddapah, as well as the accounts of foreign travelers like Paes and Nuniz. Krsna Deva Raya’s policy was rooted in ancient texts such as Sasijaya-niti, Vidura-niti, Canakya-niti, and Sukra-niti, alongside the administrative practices of preceding Muhammadan rulers. He established a structured public finance system where his income was divided into four parts: one for personal expenditure and charity, two for defense, and the final quarter for the treasury surplus. He maintained a sound treasury, which he supplemented annually by depositing millions of pardaus, a gold coin unique to Vijayanagara. His revenue strategy relied heavily on land revenue, tributes, and taxes on natural resources, mines, and waste lands. He imposed various taxes, including land taxes (Ari and Kors), excise, customs, market tolls, and specific levies on looms and boats. However, a defining feature of his administration was the remission of burdensome taxes, such as Jodi, Arasuperu, and the marriage tax, as well as tax remissions on temple lands amounting to 10,000 varahas. He prioritized irrigation by constructing anicuts at Vallabhapuram and across the Tungabhadra, and he protected cultivators during distress, avoiding exploitation. Expenditure was heavily directed toward defense, with massive daily costs for cavalry, elephants, and infantry. He also funded public works, irrigation, and the royal court's splendor. The article concludes that his policy successfully balanced income and expenditure, fostering extensive foreign trade, a prosperous populace, and a flourishing economy characterized by guilds, diverse coinage, and regulated sales.

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

Krishna Deva Raya’s economic policy demonstrates a sophisticated balance between revenue generation and public welfare, rooted in ancient Hindu political and economic traditions while adapting to the post-Islamic realities of medieval India. The study highlights his benevolent approach, particularly the systematic remission of burdensome taxes to foster commerce and alleviate cultivator distress. His financial administration prioritized a structured division of state income, allocating substantial funds for defence, public works, and charity, thereby maintaining a sound treasury. The emperor’s emphasis on irrigation infrastructure, fair trade practices, and a strategic frontier policy further underscores his vision for a prosperous and secure empire. Ultimately, his well-blended policy of charity and state enjoyment established a legacy of economic stability and cultural flourishing.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “In this short paper 30 attempt 15 made to outline the economic policy of Krsna Deva Raya 35 gathered from two main sources (1) Raysvacakams, an almost contem- porary evidence of his economic policy. and फीट state of finances in पिंड time, and (11) Amuktamalyads, a work containing autobiographical glimpses into his cconomic policy.”
  • “He laid down that the king should divide his income into four parts of which one part should be utilised for his personal expenditure and public charity; two quarters should be spent ovet the defence; and the remaining one-fourth should go to the treasury as surplus.®”
  • “He realised that घाट amount of revente depended-on the extent of domain and that itrigation should be the prime concern of his government.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Amuktamalyada, Canto IV
  2. South Indian Inscriptions, 409 of 1913
  3. Ins. Ced. Dist., 150, 259
  4. Ins. Ced. Dists., 340
  5. Raya Vacakamun, p. 34

Discussed in this article

People

  • Krsnadeva-raya 4
  • Yamunaprabhu
  • Dr. Saletore
  • Paes
  • Nuniz
  • Dr. ૭. Krishnaswami Aiyangar
  • Timmarasu

Dynasties, sects & groups

  • Vijayanagara empire

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.