Skip to content
Browse articles

A Linguistic Note on the Mundaka Upanisad

By Vidhushekhara Bhattacharya

Vol. 17 · No. 1March - 1941pp. 89–91English

Summary

This linguistic note analyses grammatical and phonological peculiarities in the Mundaka Upanisad, arguing that its language reflects a late stage of Sanskrit influenced by Prakrit and Buddhist Sanskrit. The author begins by examining imperative verb endings: the Mundaka often uses -tha where classical Sanskrit would expect -ta; forms like acaratha and bruvitha thus resemble Pali and Buddhist hybrid Sanskrit. Similarly, verbal forms such as sravayatha and the pronoun asmakam show Prakritic features. The paper notes that the Upanishad sometimes writes atharvan instead of atharva, exhibiting optional n-mutation typical of later texts. The second part of the note documents the frequent insertion of the particle hi between vowels to avoid hiatus, a practice common in Pali and Buddhist Sanskrit but rare in classical Sanskrit. Examples include yadaha paravidyam hi srutva and tadvadasi hi. The author argues that these linguistic features suggest that the Mundaka Upanisad was composed relatively late, perhaps around the beginning of the Common Era, and that its compilers were influenced by Prakrit-speaking regions or by the language of Buddhist monks. The article concludes by stressing that linguistic analysis can aid in dating Upanishadic texts and cautioning against assuming homogeneity across the corpus.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

Through a close examination of verb endings, pronoun forms and hiatus-avoidance techniques, the note demonstrates that the Mundaka Upanisad exhibits numerous deviations from classical Sanskrit. Imperative endings in -tha and the frequent insertion of hi mirror Prakrit and Buddhist Sanskrit usage. Such features imply a relatively late date of composition and suggest that the text was shaped by linguistic environments outside orthodox Brahmanical Sanskrit. This linguistic evidence enriches our understanding of the evolution of Sanskrit and the diversity of Upanishadic style.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “The Mundaka 15 regarded as one of फीड principal Upanisads. As re-. gards 105 languagc., it presents some pecultarities which are not to be found 10 other Upanisads.”
  • “The language used 10 this Upanisad 15 m__yu'ch influenced by Prakritism and the Buddhist or फीट mixed Sanskrit as found in"such Buddhist Sanskrit works as the Mabavastu, etc.”
  • “Such forms are well-known in Buddhist Ske., e.g. 22 (Mabivasts 111, p. 1) for prativedayata; anetha (p. 8) for anayata; karotha (p- 24) for kuruta.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Mabavastu
  2. Vijasaneyi-sambita
  3. Whitney’s Sanskrit Grammar
  4. Aitareya Brabmana
  5. Apastamba-dbarmasitra

Discussed in this article

People

Texts & works

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Vidhushekhara Bhattacharya

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Vedic Rites and Non-Traivarṇikas

By Vidhushekhara Bhattacharya

September - 1946
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Miscellany: Guṇaratna’s Tarkarahasyadīpikā and Dharmakīrti’s Pramāṇavārttika

By Vidhushekhara Bhattacharya

March - 1940
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Gaudapada

By Vidhushekhara Bhattacharya

June - 1938
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Horse of Sakyasimha

By Vidhushekhara Bhattacharya

September - 1936