Skip to content
Browse articles

Date and Works of Rayamukuta

By Dinesh Chandra Bhattacharya

Vol. 17 · No. 4December - 1941pp. 456–471English

Summary

In this companion piece to the previous article, the author examines chronologies proposed for Bṛhaspati Rayāmukuṭa and assesses the authenticity of works attributed to him. Scholars had previously dated Rayāmukuṭa to the fourteenth century based on a single reference to Śaka 1353 in a commentary on the Amarakośa. The article argues that this date is unreliable because the verse may have been interpolated by a later scribe. Instead, the author divides Rayāmukuṭa’s career into three phases: an early period when he wrote under the patronage of Rājyadhara or Jalāl ud‑Dīn; a middle phase when he gained the title Ācārya and composed extensive commentaries; and a mature phase when he was honoured as Kavi‑cakravartin and compiled a Smṛti digest entitled Smṛti‑ratnavalī. The dating is supported by internal references, palaeographic evidence and cross‑referencing with contemporary events, such as the fall of the Iliyas Shāh dynasty and the accession of Raja Ganesha. The article also surveys works sometimes misattributed to Rayāmukuṭa and concludes that some treatises on poetics and law were written by his disciples or imitators. It emphasises the need for critical editions to distinguish genuine compositions from later pastiches. By analysing manuscripts preserved in London, Calcutta and the Royal Asiatic Society’s collections, the author pieces together a more coherent biography. He concludes that Rayāmukuṭa should be placed in the early fifteenth century and that his oeuvre reflects a highly productive scholar who responded to changing patronage and intellectual demands.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

A careful study of colophons, manuscript dates and historical context allows the author to correct earlier guesses about Rayāmukuṭa’s life. Rather than relying on a single dubious date, the article situates his works in relation to a known patron and contemporary political events. It argues convincingly that Rayāmukuṭa wrote during the first half of the fifteenth century and that later scribes expanded his corpus. This reassessment highlights the importance of critical philology in reconstructing the careers of medieval Indian scholars.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “Brhaspati Misra, better known by one of his many dtles of distinction, viz., ‘Rayamukuta’, was a most prominent figure 10 the literary history બ Bengal in the 15th cent. AD.”
  • “As early ૩5 1807 A.D. Colebrooke examined Riyamukuta’s commentary on the Amarakosa and ascertained 165 age “from the incidental mention of a date viz. 1353 Saca, or 4532 of the Caliyuga, corresponding ૬૦ A.D. 2 34૩1. 5.”

Works cited in this article

  1. ZDMG., vol. XXVIIIL
  2. 1. 0. Cat. p. 278
  3. Eggeling's 1. 0. Cat., [ 14
  4. Castes and Sects of Bengal, Kayastha Kinda vol. V (=Uttara-Ridhiya-Kayastha-Kanda, pt. 11) pp. 84-9

Discussed in this article

People

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Dinesh Chandra Bhattacharya

All articles →
Sambodhi

Kalinjar Fort: The Time Winner Ancientmost Fort of India

By Dinesh Chandra Bhattacharya

1996
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Was Jalal-ud-Din the Patron of Rayamukuta?

By Dinesh Chandra Bhattacharya

June - 1953
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Sraddhasagara of Kulluka Bhatta

By Dinesh Chandra Bhattacharya

June - 1951
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Gaṅgādāsa and his Father Gopāladasa

By Dinesh Chandra Bhattacharya

December - 1948