Skip to content
Browse articles

Doctrines of the Mahāsāṃghika School of Buddhism

By Nalinaksha Dutt

Vol. 13 · No. 4Dec-37pp. 549–580English

Summary

The Mahāsāṃghika school, the earliest Buddhist sect to secede from the original community (later known as Theravāda or Sthaviravāda), emerged during the Second Buddhist Council at Vesali. While traditionally attributed to disputes over Vinaya rule interpretations, scholars suggest doctrinal differences predated the split. The Mahāsāṃghikas further divided into sub-schools, including Ekavyavahārika, Lokottaravāda, Kāyaka, Balmṛtika, and Sthaviravāda. Key doctrines, derived from Vasumitra’s treatise and the Kathāvatthu, include: 1. **Buddha’s Nature**: The Buddha was transcendent (loka-uttara), existing beyond human realms, with a body composed of pure, unchanging dharmas (e.g., sila, samadhi) rather than physical form. His teachings were delivered through created images, not a historical person. 2. **Dharma and Sanyata**: Some sub-schools emphasized Dharmakaya (the Buddha’s essence as ultimate reality) and Sanyata (emptiness), evolving concepts among later Mahāsāṃghika groups like the Uttarapathakas. 3. **Heterodoxy**: The Theravada criticized Mahāsāṃghika views as heretical, particularly their denial of the Buddha’s earthly existence and conventional compassion (karuṇā). The Mahāsāṃghika doctrines, preserved in Vasumitra’s Chinese-translated work and corroborated by the Kathāvatthu, highlight early Buddhist doctrinal diversity and the development

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

The analysis of Vasumitra’s treatise and the Kathavatthu reveals the Mahāsāṃghika school’s doctrinal distinctions through comparative frameworks, emphasizing their departure from early Buddhist orthodoxy. These texts, validated by their mutual corroboration, highlight controversies over the Buddha’s transcendence, the nature of dharmas, and the interpretation of Vinaya rules. The Mahāsāṃghikas’ sub-schools further diversified these positions, reflecting early Buddhism’s dynamic evolution. This study underscores the significance of these sources in reconstructing sectarian debates, offering a nuanced understanding of doctrinal development in ancient Buddhism. Their enduring scholarly value lies in illuminating the intellectual and philosophical currents that shaped later Buddhist traditions.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “The Mahasanghikas are the eatliest to secede from the original school which came later on to be 'di'stinguishcd as the Theravadins (or 11 Sanskrit Sthaviravadins).”
  • “In Vasunmitra's treatse the Buddhas are deseribed ૧૬ fokaottara (supramundanc), and as जाली, he 15 made of andsrava dbarmas’ (pure”
  • “The close, some- times cvenr verbatim, agreement between पाए Kathavatthu and Vasumitra's treatise about the doctrines of घाट schools enables us to state that both the work must be old and authentic and should be regarded as authoritative as far as पीट doctrines of the schools are concerned.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Vasumitra's treatise
  2. Kathavatthu
  3. Muw., 1, p. 164
  4. Aspecis., pp. 117, 820
  5. Laika, pp. 28, 34

Discussed in this article

People

Places

Dynasties, sects & groups

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Nalinaksha Dutt

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Review: Histoire du Bouddhisme Indien des Origines à l'ère Saka

By Nalinaksha Dutt

March - 1960
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Survival of the Paippalada Atharvaveda in Eastern India

By Nalinaksha Dutt

March - 1960
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Buddhism in Chinese History

By Nalinaksha Dutt

March - 1959
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Second Buddhist Council

By Nalinaksha Dutt

March - 1959