Skip to content
Browse articles

A Study of the Smrti Passages in the Mahabhasya

By Amalananda Ghosh

Vol. 11 · No. 1March - 1935pp. 77–90English

Summary withheld

An automated check found that the earlier summary of this article may not match its text, so it is hidden while it is rewritten. Please read the original PDF below.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “The scholarship of Patafijali, the author of the Mahabhasya, was so vast ધોળાં there are few subjects which he left untouched in the course of his masterly discussions on the rules of”
  • “The passages naturally fall into three categories:— A. [90550263 which are found with little or no change in the earlier Smritis.? B. DPassages which find their parallels 10 the Smrtis, though verbally they do not agree, C. 11૭50263 which have no parallels in any एव the extant Smrtis,”
  • “There 15 no passage 10 the Muhidbhdasya from which we can definitely say ihat Patafijali has borrowed from our present texts, The Ydadjiavallya- smyty is admittedly છ late work, and any borrowing from it by Patafijali is out of the question.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Kunte, Ticissitudes of Aryan Civilization, p. 200

Discussed in this article

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.