An automated check found that the earlier summary of this article may not match its text, so it is hidden while it is rewritten. Please read the original PDF below.
Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.
“The interminable controversy ઘડ 10 the ૦૩૪૯૬ significance of the form of the capitals of Muuriyan pillars (stambhas) and their so-called affinity with Persiam forms seems, in the gpinion of the present writer, to have been terminated and given the guietus by a direct piece of evidence,”
“The Agoknn pillars {recovered in various કાફ, e.g, Senchi, Sarnath, Rampurva, Sankiso, Basarh, Louriya Nandangarh, ett consist of long shafts, slightly tapering towards the tup, currying an abacus in the form a styliZee lotus-form with its petals spread out”
“These considerations unquestionably demonstrate that the Adokan pillars could not have been modelled on, or derived from, Achemenian examples and are fundamentally different in their design, symbolism, and technique.”
People
Places
AI guide
Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.
Article order
Inline viewer
Checking source PDF
The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.