Skip to content
Browse articles

Tamil Brāhmī Script of Madurai

By T. V. G. Sastri

Vol. 17 · No. 011998pp. 7–11English

Summary

This article explores the Tamil-Brāhmī inscriptions found in cave sites around Madurai, highlighting their linguistic features, chronology, paleography, and Jaina associations. Key Points: 1. Cave Sites and Inscriptions: Dr. I. Mahadevan documented 76 inscriptions from 21 caves in Tamil Nadu, with 52 from Madurai alone. These inscriptions, written in Tamil language using Brāhmī script, often show Prakrit loanwords and symbolic notations at the end rather than the beginning. 2. Chronological Classification: On paleographic considerations, Dr I. Mahadevan classified the inscriptions into four periods—Archaic, Early, Middle, and Transitional. Most of the inscriptions belong to the first two periods, indicating the caves were active for over 400 years. 3. Script Features: i) Use of Tamilized Brāhmī where, for example, ta substitutes da (e.g., tana for dāna). ii) Orthographic variations observed in repeated inscriptions. iii) Strong resemblance to Asokan characters with some deviations (e.g., ra form). iv) Names use Tamil case endings, avoiding Prakrit genitives. 4. Architectural Features: i) Two cave types: natural (geologically formed) and excavated (man-made). ii) Architectural elements include drip-ledges, overhangs, latticed windows, and regular access steps. iii) Though primitive compared to Bihar’s caves, their origin may lie in southern structural concepts. iv) Inscriptional evidence includes guild-based patronage (goldsmiths, merchants) akin to Amaravati and Ajanta. 5. Jaina Connections: i) Many inscriptions mention Jaina donors and monks, with similarities noted between Madurai and Vaddamānu (Andhra) Jaina sites. ii) Literary connections are drawn to Kanakabhikshu (Kanakabhūta), possibly identified with Kaniyananta of the Mankulam cave.

Summary reviewed by a volunteer editor.

Conclusion

The Tamil-Brāhmī inscriptions of Madurai caves represent a rich Jaina heritage, showcasing early linguistic assimilation, script evolution, and architectural experimentation. These findings reinforce the idea of a vibrant Jaina presence in South India, intricately linked with broader cultural and literary traditions.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “According to one estimate, it appears there are 26 ancient caves in Madurai district. But, Dr. I. Mahadevan has reported only 12 of them with Tamil-Bramhi inscriptions from the hill ranges of Madurai.”
  • “Most of the inscriptions have been deciphered and are written in the local Tamil language but with Bramhi script. Sometimes, the Prakrit forms like favira, upasan may be said to have been brought into the popular Tamil language.”

Works cited in this article

  1. L Arhat Vacana, p.30, Vol.2, No.1, 1989
  2. Vaddamanu shows the symbols at the end of the inscription, but in Hathigumpha they are shown at the beginning
  3. Bul, of the Madras Govt. Museum General Section, (New Series), pp.271-272
  4. Burgess, Archaeological Survey Reports of Western India, 1, pp.126-138
  5. See also A. Cunningham’s Stupa of Bharhut, pp. 127-143

Discussed in this article

People

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by T. V. G. Sastri

All articles →
Jinamanjari

Jaina Iconography: Toward a Comparative Approach

By Thomas Mcevilley, T. V. G. Sastri

2002
Jinamanjari

Jina Sculpture and Iconographic Norms

By T. V. G. Sastri

2000
Jinamanjari

Book Reviews

By Jack C. Laughlin, Tinamarie Jones, Binod Kumar Tiwary, T. V. G. Sastri, Jyoti Prasad Jain

1999
Jinamanjari

New Digest

By T. V. G. Sastri

1998