Skip to content
Browse articles

Editorial

Vol. 17 · No. 011998pp. 1–2English

Summary

This editorial focuses on the long-standing sectarian dispute between the Digambara and Svetambara Jain communities over the ownership and management of Mount Sammeda (Pārśvanātha Hill)—a sacred Jain pilgrimage site believed to be where 21 Tirthankaras attained nirvāṇa. Key Points: 1. Background of the Dispute: Although both sects revere the site, the Svetambaras held exclusive administrative control for decades, which the Digambaras contested. Legal challenges were ongoing for years. 2. Patna High Court Judgment (1997): Justice P.K. Deb ruled that no sect has exclusive rights over Mount Sammeda. The site belongs to the Jain community as a whole, invalidating claims by the Anandji-Kalyanji trust of the Svetambara sect. 3. Legal Grounds: The court noted that, post-abolition of the zamindari system, the land was vested with the state of Bihar, and as a religious institution, it should be jointly managed by a state-formed committee and Jain representatives. 4. Supreme Court Dismissal (November 1997): The appeal by the Svetambara trust was dismissed by the Supreme Court, upholding the High Court's verdict, as reported in Gommatavani, a Kannada Jain journal. 5. Significance for Global Jain Community: The editorial celebrates this as a moment of unity, encouraging shared sanctity and management of Jain pilgrimage sites across sectarian lines, especially among North American Jains aiming to foster a united Jain identity.

Summary reviewed by a volunteer editor.

Conclusion

The court rulings affirm that Mount Sammeda belongs to the entire Jain community, not any one sect. This landmark decision promotes unity and shared sanctity among Digambaras and Svetambaras, offering hope for greater harmony and cooperation within the global Jain community.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “Historical records show that the Jaina church was split into two major traditions - the Digambaras and the Svetambaras in 82 CE.”
  • “The Ranchi Bench of the Patna High Court of Bihar state passed judgment that no particular sect can claim exclusive right over Mount Sammeda as this religious institution belongs to the Jain community as a whole.”
  • “On November 6, 1997, the Supreme Court Justices M.M. Pumchi and M.V. Srinivasan declared that the judgment of the High Court of Bihar is valid on the grounds of the land act of that state, and therefore the case is been dismissed.”

Works cited in this article

  1. The Times of India, Sunday, July 6, 1997 edition

Discussed in this article

People

  • Kalyanji
  • U.N. Bachawat
  • Soli J. Sorabji
  • R K Jain
  • Justice P.K. Deb
  • D.K. Jain
  • M.M. Pumchi
  • M.V. Srinivasan
  • Harish Salai
  • Seth Anandj
  • F.N. Nariman

Places

  • Mount Sammeda
  • Pargvanatha Hill

Texts & works

  • Gommatavani

Dynasties, sects & groups

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.