Skip to content
Browse articles

A Sidelight on Social, Economic and Political Aspects of Kulakara Order

By J. C. Sikdar

Vol. 8 · No. 1Jul-73pp. 21–29English
Doctrine Of KarmaPath Of Liberation

Summary

J. C. Sikdar’s article offers a socio-economic interpretation of the Kulakara system described in Jaina Agamas. The Kulakara order represents an early communal phase of human society in which extended families lived together under a patriarch called a Kulakara. There was no distinction between rulers and subjects; rights and duties were shared equally, and the population was sparse except within the household community. Division of labour was based solely on sex: men performed activities such as hunting and agriculture while women managed domestic affairs. Goods produced by the community were held in common and there was no concept of private property. This arrangement resembles the primitive communism described by Marx and Engels. As the Kulakara system evolved, humans began domesticating animals like cows and buffaloes for milk and draught power. Historical evidence from Aryan, Semitic and Turanian tribes supports this depiction. Domestication led to the formation of pastoral tribes who specialised in raising cattle, marking the first significant social division of labour. Although arable land remained collectively owned by the clan and allocated to households for use, rudimentary rights of possession emerged. Technological advances such as weaving and metal smelting increased production in agriculture and handicrafts. Surplus production heightened labour demands and allowed accumulation of goods. According to Engels, this surplus transformed family relations: men, who herded the livestock and controlled new wealth, gained authority while women’s roles became confined to consumption without ownership. Sikdar draws parallels between the stages of Kulakara society and Marxist theories of historical materialism. He argues that the introduction of domesticated animals, tools and crafts gradually eroded the communal household. Surplus production and emerging property rights fostered exploitation and class distinctions. Households began to break away from the communal family, developing into independent economic units. Thus, the communistic Kulakara order eventually gave way to a socio-economic system based on private property and social stratification. By examining early Jaina narratives through the lens of modern socio-economic theory, the article demonstrates how religious texts preserve insights into the evolution of human society.

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

Sikdar presents the Kulakara order as an example of primitive communism characterised by shared labour and common property. He shows that domestication, technological innovation and surplus production initiated the first division of labour and emergent property rights. These developments led to the breakdown of communal households and the rise of private property, reflecting broader patterns of socio-economic evolution described by Marxist theory. The analysis highlights the value of Jaina texts as sources for reconstructing early human social structures.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “At the stage of Kulakara system the grandeur and the limitation of the gentile order were that there was no place for rulers and the ruled, In internal affairs there was no distinction between rights and duties.”
  • “The free tribal organization broke down with the course of social evolution and never developed again; the confederacy of the tribal people already indicated the beginning of its downfall.”
  • “Men were born free, lived free and died free. The cancer of Indian caste system, social, economic and political bondage and class interest, which has sapped the vital force of the Indian people, was non-existent in the social body of that Age.”

Works cited in this article

  1. The Origin of the Family, etc., p. 155
  2. Ibid., p. 156
  3. Ibid., p. 158
  4. Ibid., p. 159
  5. Avasyakacurni, Pt. 1, p. 156

Discussed in this article

People

Dynasties, sects & groups

  • Kula
  • Kulakara order
  • Semites
  • Turanians
  • Aryas 3

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by J. C. Sikdar

All articles →
Sambodhi

A Glimpse of Medical Recipes of the Jainas

By J. C. Sikdar

February - 1990
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Indian Atomism

By J. C. Sikdar

January - 1989
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Indian Atomism Part II

By J. C. Sikdar

October - 1988
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Indian Atomism

By J. C. Sikdar

July - 1988

Continue reading

Related articles

Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Jaina Phraseology in the Bhagavadgita

By K. H. Kamdar

July - 1979
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Jainism, Mahavira, Buddha and Nirvana

By Narayan M. Kansara

July - 2001
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Studies in Jaina Iconography

By A. K. Bhattacharya

April - 2006
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Nivvanam Paramam Jai Ghayasitti Vva Pavae

By Ram Prakash Poddar

Jan - 1980
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Jainism and Unification Thought

By Suzuko Ohira

January - 1997