Skip to content
Browse articles

Notion of Obliquity of Ecliptic Implied in the Concept of Mount Meru in Jambudvipa Prajnapti

By Sajjan Singh Lishk, S. D. Sharma

Vol. XII · No. 3Jan - 1978pp. 79–92English

Summary

Using the Jain canonical work Jambudvīpa Prajñapti, S.S. Lish and S.D. Sharma examine whether the description of Mount Meru encodes knowledge of the obliquity of the ecliptic – the tilt of the earth’s axis relative to its orbital plane. The authors note that Jambudvīpa Prajñapti belongs to the post-Sūtrakṛtāṅga period of the Śvetāmbara canon and is significant for its cosmological descriptions. In the text Mount Meru is the axis around which the cosmos revolves and is described as having the shape of a truncated cone with precise dimensions. The paper explores whether the unusual dimensions of Meru – its height, girth and ratio of peak to base – correspond to the degree of axial tilt. It also examines sixteen name‑variants of Mount Meru found in other sources, ranging from Mandara and Padmarāṇa to Svaruṇasammā, and discusses their etymologies and astronomical significance. The authors argue that several Jaina notions, such as the idea of a flat earth encircled by circular continents and seas (sāmudra sīdhi), can be reconciled with a model in which Meru is inclined at an angle to the pole of the ecliptic. They propose that the projection of the pole of the ecliptic onto a flat earth would appear as a circular area whose centre corresponds to Mount Meru. This model would preserve the cosmographical symbolism of Meru while implicitly recognising that the celestial pole does not align perfectly with the axis of the earth. To support this interpretation, the paper analyses verses from the Jambudvīpa Prajñapti that describe the rising and setting of the sun and the relative lengths of day and night in different regions, noting that these observations can be explained by the earth’s axial tilt. The authors also compare Jain cosmology with early Hindu astronomical texts and with Ptolemaic models, highlighting similarities in the way ancient cultures conceptualised the heavens. Although the paper deals with highly specialised topics, it emphasises the interdisciplinary value of examining religious cosmology through an astronomical lens. By showing that the Jain description of Mount Meru may contain encoded observations about the obliquity of the ecliptic, the article encourages historians to revisit other cosmological myths for hidden scientific insights. The study thus bridges the gap between mythological symbolism and scientific understanding, demonstrating that medieval Indian scholars may have had a more sophisticated grasp of astronomical phenomena than is often acknowledged.

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

The article concludes that the cosmological model described in the Jambudvīpa Prajñapti is not merely mythological but may conceal an awareness of the earth’s axial tilt. Lish and Sharma argue that the shape and position of Mount Meru and the arrangement of continents and oceans imply a recognition that the axis of the world is inclined relative to the ecliptic. By reinterpreting traditional descriptions in astronomical terms, the authors show that Jain cosmology could accommodate scientific observations within its religious worldview.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “Here a simple probe is rendered into the concept of mount Meru in Jambiidvipa Prajiiapti, a Jaina canonical work of post-Vedanga preSiddhantic period (also called dark period) in the history of ancient Indian astronomy.”
  • “It is revealed that dimensions of Meru fit certain astronomical constants, e.g. obliquity of ecliptic. Thus Meru represents a tentative astronomical model of notion of obliquity of ecliptic.”
  • “The name variants Meru, Sineru and Sumeru also seem to indicate a foriegn origin.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Shastri, Balchandra (1962) Lokavibhaga (Hindi tr.), vv. 1.327-329, p. 41
  2. Needham, J. and Wang, L. (1959) Science and Civilization in China, Vol. 3 pp. 531(d), 563, 568, 589
  3. Golikere, R. K. (1933) Through Wonderlands of the Universe, p. 371
  4. Tilak, B. G. (1971) The Arctic Home in the Vedas, second reprint, pp. 55-60
  5. Misra, B. P. (1963 B.S.) Surya Siddhanta (Sanskrit commentary), xil. 67. p. 214

Discussed in this article

Places

Texts & works

Dynasties, sects & groups

  • Zoroastrians

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Sajjan Singh Lishk

All articles →
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Mathematical Aspects of Jambudvipa

By Sajjan Singh Lishk

Oct - 1987
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Psycho‑Social Aspects of Jaina Mathematics

By Sajjan Singh Lishk, Amarjit Kaur

July - 1987
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Main Characteristics and Achievements of Jaina School of Ancient Indian Astronomy

By Sajjan Singh Lishk

January - 1987
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Main Characteristics and Achievements of Jaina School of Ancient Indian Astronomy

By Sajjan Singh Lishk

Jan - 1987