Skip to content
Browse articles

The 24 Buddhas and the 24 Tirthankaras

By Suzuko Ohira

Vol. 29 · No. 1July - 1994pp. 9–22English

Summary

Suzuko Ohira’s article is a meticulous comparative study of how Buddhists enumerate past Buddhas and how Jains count their twenty‑four Tīrthaṅkaras. The author begins by tracing the idea of a series of enlightened teachers to Vedic precedents such as the seven vipras of the Ṛgveda and the early Buddhist lists of seven Buddhas. She notes that Asoka’s inscriptions and the canonical Āgamas already refer to a sequence of past Buddhas and that later Buddhist texts expand the list to thirty‑two and forty‑five Buddhas, with still more enumerations appearing in works like the Apadāna. Ohira then turns to the Jaina tradition, which fixes the number of Tīrthaṅkaras at twenty‑four across the endless cycles of cosmic time. Drawing on textual sources such as the Samavāyānga and Uttarādhyayana as well as archaeological evidence from Mathurā, Vaibhāragiri and Udayagiri, she examines when images of the Tīrthaṅkaras began to be carved and how the Jains developed a distinct iconography. Jina images in the nude are indistinguishable unless flanked by attendant figures or marked with their individual lanchanas, a feature that appears only in the post‑canonical period. The paper also surveys parallels in the life stories of the twenty‑four Buddhas and twenty‑four Tīrthaṅkaras and discusses how lay followers may have moved between the Pārśvan and Mahāvīra communities. Ohira concludes that despite superficial similarities, the Buddhist lists are flexible and often expand or contract, whereas the Jaina sequence of twenty‑four Tīrthaṅkaras is remarkably stable and probably predates the later Buddhist enumerations. The study situates both traditions within a broader Indian milieu in which the number twenty‑four was symbolically significant and highlights the dynamic exchange of religious ideas in ancient India.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

Ohira’s investigation shows that although Buddhists and Jains both remember lineages of enlightened teachers, their lists emerged from different historical processes. The Buddhist catalogues were expanded over time for doctrinal reasons, while the Jaina tradition consistently affirmed twenty‑four Tīrthaṅkaras as the liberating guides of each cycle. Recognising the shared cultural milieu yet separate development of these enumerations helps clarify how Indian religions influenced one another without losing their distinct identities.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “The Buddhists enumerate the past 7 buddhas, 24 buddhas and so on, and the Jainas also count the 24 firthankaras.”
  • “The past 7 buddhas and 24 buddhas, etc. came into being centering around the Buddha himself, for the concept of the past buddhas developed as the past birth stories of the Buddha himself.”
  • “Then, the Jainas must have adopted the number of tirthankaras from the Buddhist side. We would like to develop these topics in this paper, so that we can justify the said position that the 24 ftirthankaras of the Jainas came into existence later than the 24 buddhas.”

Works cited in this article

  1. H. Nakamura : His Selected Works, v.11, p.489
  2. H. Ui : Studies of Indian Philosophy, v.4, p. 216
  3. H. Ui: Jbid., v.2, p.166
  4. E. Maeda : A History of the Formation of Original Buddhist Texts, p.768
  5. T. Kimura :His Collected Works, v.5, pp. 83ff.

Discussed in this article

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Suzuko Ohira

All articles →
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Jainism and Unification Thought

By Suzuko Ohira

January - 1997
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Problems of the Purva

By Suzuko Ohira

Oct - 1980
Sambodhi

Main Features of Mahavira’s Contributions

By Suzuko Ohira

April 1980 - January 1981
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Yoga-Triplet

By Suzuko Ohira

April - 1980