Skip to content
Browse articles

The Jaina Concept of Omniscience (Kevalajñāna)

By Gour Hazra

Vol. 37 · No. 3January - 2003pp. 163–169English

Summary

The Jaina concept of omniscience (kevala‑jñāna) represents the highest form of cognition in Jain epistemology. Kevala‑jñāna is one of five types of knowledge and the third type of extra‑sensory perception. The Nandī Sūtra defines it as the knowledge that knows all substances, space, time and modes, while Āvasyakaniryukti calls it infinite and eternal. Tattvārtha Bhāṣya further characterises it as perfect, complete, unique, absolute, pure, all‑comprehensive and infinite. These definitions underline that omniscience in Jainism is pure, boundless awareness, encompassing both the world and the non‑world. Kevala‑jñāna arises when knowledge‑obscuring karma is completely destroyed. It is described as independent and unobstructed cognition and the ultimate experience. Scholars such as S. Radhakrishnan note that it marks the final consummation of moral and spiritual life and is self‑established and spiritual. Ramjee Singh emphasises that omniscience is not intellectual but spiritual knowledge. At this stage the kevalin perceives all substances and their modes across past, present and future directly. The article stresses that omniscience is inherent in every soul but obscured by karma; through right faith, knowledge and conduct, the soul can manifest kevala‑jñāna. Comparing Jainism with other Indian systems, the article notes that Nyāya‑Vaiśeṣika equates omniscience with knowledge of seven categories, Buddhists with knowledge of the five aggregates, Vedantins with knowledge of Brahman, while Jains define it as all‑comprehensive knowledge of six categories. Except for the Mīmāṃsakas and Cārvākas, most schools accept the possibility of human omniscience, but Śramaṇa traditions emphasise it to grant infallibility to their prophets. Jainism uniquely views omniscience as purely human and actual—direct knowledge of all knowable across space and time. The article addresses objections from Mīmāṃsakas who argue that omniscience cannot be established through standard pramāṇas. Jains reply that kevala‑jñāna is an extra‑sensory perception beyond ordinary sense‑object contact. They maintain that knowledge is limitless and infinite; when the soul shines in full splendour it attains omniscience. Kevala‑jñāna thus bridges epistemology and soteriology: it is the culmination of the soul’s four infinites (knowledge, perception, bliss and energy) and precedes liberation. Because the teachings of omniscient Tirthaṅkaras derive from this state, omniscience underwrites the authority of Jain scriptures and offers every soul a path to freedom.

Summary reviewed by a volunteer editor.

Conclusion

Kevala‑jñāna is central to Jain epistemology and soteriology. Defined as perfect, complete and infinite knowledge, it is attained when karmic obstructions are destroyed so that the soul can directly perceive all substances across time and space. Unlike Nyāya‑Vaiśeṣika, Buddhist or Vedāntic notions, Jainism treats omniscience as an actual human achievement. By answering Mīmāṃsaka objections and describing kevala‑jñāna as an extra‑sensory perception beyond ordinary pramāṇas, the article underscores Jainism’s distinctive belief that liberation and infinite knowledge are attainable through self‑discipline. Omniscience thus grounds the authority of Tirthaṅkara teachings and charts the aspirant’s journey to freedom.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “The first part of my study is mainly concerned with the nature and definition of omniscience of the Jainas and in the second part, an attempt has been made here to compare it with some other parallel Indian views, specially, Nyaya-Vaisesika and Advaita Vedantins.”
  • “According to niscya drsti, omniscience is self-revealing, a kevali is indifferent to the world, so he knows only his pure self.”
  • “But in the case of kevalajriana or omniscience of the Jainas the question of acquirement does not arise. Here knowledge is not something, which is to be acquired, Self itself is knowledge.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Tattvarthadutra, 1.30
  2. Yasovijaya, Jiiana-bindu-prakarana - 4
  3. Niyamasara - 171

Discussed in this article

People

Places

  • lokgloka

Texts & works

Dynasties, sects & groups

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Gour Hazra

All articles →
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

The Concept of Mind in Indian Thought with Special Reference to Jaina System

By Gour Hazra

April - 1989
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Anekantavada in the Light of Some Other Modern Views

By Gour Hazra

Oct - 1982
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

A Brief Account of the Jaina View of Inference

By Gour Hazra

Jan - 1981