Skip to content
Browse articles

A Study of the Jaina Theory of Knowledge — On Matijnana in the Sabhasya Tattvarthasutra

By Yensho Kanakura

Vol. 4 · No. 3-41975-76pp. 1–10English

Summary

A Study of the Jaina Theory of Knowledge — On Matijnana in the Sabhasya Tattvarthasutra explores the epistemological framework of Jainism through Umāsvāti’s Tattvārthasūtra and its Sabhāṣya (auto-commentary). Yensho Kanakura notes that the terse aphoristic style of the T.S. requires explanatory notes for readers to grasp its meaning. He sets out to investigate the logical construction of the text and focuses on the theory of knowledge (jñāna), particularly the category of mati-jñāna or sensory‑mental cognition. Kanakura contextualises the discussion within the Jain conception of the “three jewels” (samyag-darśana, samyag-jñāna and samyag-cāritra), which constitute the path to liberation (mokṣa). He explains how T.S. enumerates twenty basic categories relevant to knowledge acquisition, including pramāṇa (means of valid knowledge), naya (perspectives), and dravya (substance), and discusses their interrelations. Drawing from the Sabhāṣya, Kanakura analyses the classification of knowledge into pratyakṣa (direct) and parokṣa (indirect) forms, subdividing them further into sensory, scriptural and clairvoyant types. He compares Jain epistemology with Buddhist and Nyāya theories, noting the Jain emphasis on syādvāda (the doctrine of conditional predication) and anekāntavāda (the doctrine of non‑one‑sidedness) which promote pluralistic perspectives. The article also explores how right knowledge is inseparable from right faith and conduct; without correct perception of reality (tattva), one cannot attain liberation. Kanakura highlights the role of ethical conduct in removing karmic obscurations that limit knowledge. He also discusses the method of classification in T.S., pointing out unresolved problems in the sequence of categories and suggesting that Umāsvāti intentionally aligns the order with soteriological priorities. The study concludes that the Jaina theory of knowledge is a sophisticated system that integrates metaphysics, logic and ethics. Understanding the classification of mati-jñāna clarifies how Jain philosophers conceived the progressive refinement of cognition from sensory experience to omniscience, and how this progression underlies the path to liberation.

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

Kanakura concludes that the Jaina theory of knowledge integrates metaphysics, epistemology and ethics. By analysing mati‑jñāna within the Tattvārthasūtra and Sabhāṣya, he shows that right knowledge is inseparable from right faith and conduct. The classification of knowledge leads from sensory perception to omniscience, illustrating the spiritual path and highlighting the sophistication of Jain philosophy.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “Amongst these three jewels constituting the necessary condition for moksa, samyag-danana Is denned as taittMWvWama* samyag-darsanam”
  • “The five jnsnas therein are expounded, tat-pramtine (10)', that is, these are to be divided into two pramUnas, .e., parokta and pratyak$a,”
  • “MatljKand, the first kind of paroksa pramana, which is said to be 'matiti imrlft samjfifi cintin 'bhinibodha ity-anarth'ontaram (13)', is divided into two,”

Works cited in this article

  1. Die Lahre der Jamas, 72
  2. Jaeofoi and Jaini

Discussed in this article

People

Texts & works

  • Nyayavattira

Dynasties, sects & groups

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.