Skip to content
Browse articles

Alankarakarika – a critical study

By Parul N. Mankad

Vol. 252002pp. 38–44English

Summary

Indian poetics concerns the devices and figures that embellish expression. The science of alankara (figures of speech) is called Alamkarashastra. Ancient scholars such as Dandin define alankara as that which ornaments poetic composition like a jewel; Vamana and Mammata emphasise that alankaras bring about poetic excellence and charm. Treatises classify alankaras into two types: shabdālankāras (figures of sound) and arthālankāras (figures of meaning). Shabdālankāras include devices that embellish sound, such as alliteration, repetition and puns; they create musicality and resonance. Arthālankāras involve imaginative use of meaning, such as simile, metaphor, poetic fancy and hyperbole. Alankarakarika is a major treatise that studies these figures critically. It explores not only definitions but also functions, illustrating how alankaras evoke aesthetic pleasure. The text analyses the relationship between alankara and rasa, arguing that figures of speech are not merely ornamental but integral to meaning. The author examines classical debates over whether alankaras constitute the essence of poetry or are secondary embellishments. Later theorists like Ruyyaka and Jagannatha contended that alankaras must enhance the dominant sentiment without overpowering it. A critical study of Alankarakarika systematically categorises numerous alankaras and provides examples from poets like Kālidāsa and Bhavabhūti. It differentiates between simile and metaphor based on directness, and between hyperbole and circumlocution based on exaggeration versus indirection. It examines complex figures such as indirect praise and contrasting comparison. The treatise emphasises that alankaras should emerge naturally from the poet’s inspiration; mechanical insertion appears forced. By discussing both the strengths and limitations of earlier classifications, it offers refined definitions and proposes new subcategories. Ultimately, the study shows that alankaras are not decorative afterthoughts but integral tools that enable poets to convey layered meanings, evoke emotional responses and create lasting images. Understanding these rhetorical devices helps readers appreciate the sophisticated artistry of Sanskrit poetry.

Summary reviewed by a volunteer editor.

Conclusion

The critical analysis of Alankarakarika shows that figures of speech are fundamental to poetry. By classifying alankaras and examining their functions, the treatise reveals how sound and meaning work together to enhance rasa. Appreciating these devices allows readers to experience the nuances of Sanskrit literature and understand the theoretical debates that shaped Indian poetics.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “The present work proposes to discuss arthalamkaras in Kuvalayinanda as delineated in it.”
  • “The author was a Jaina Acirya, so this is one more contribution of Jaina Gurjara Acirya to the”

Works cited in this article

  1. Candriloka
  2. Kuvalayananda
  3. Alamkarakarika
  4. Kuvalayanandadipika

Discussed in this article

People

Texts & works

  • Alamkarakarika
  • Kuvalayananda
  • Candraloka
  • Alanikdramahodadhi
  • Kuvalayanandadipika

Dynasties, sects & groups

  • Jaina Gurjara Acirya

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Article order

In this issue

Vol. 25
1–19The influence of various darśanas on the interpretation and presentation of the Rasa TheoryP. R. Vora20–37General Introduction to uparupakas and examination of Sri Gadita and Durnirika in particularTapasvi Shambhuchandra Nandi38–44Alankarakarika – a critical studyParul N. MankadCurrent article45–55Madhyamika’s theory of error in comparison with Anyakhyati of Suddhadvaita schoolYajneshwar S. Shastri56–64Prthu Vainya Episode—An Astronomical InterpretationD. G. Vedia65–74Dimensions of Babanagara inscription [Vide South Indian Inscriptions, Vol. XVIII. No. 187, C. E. 1168, pp. 256-59]Hampa Nagarajaiah75–90Verses relating to Svabhavavada – a collectionRam Krishna Bhattacharya91–120Sarasvatikanthabharana – the magnum opus of Sanskrit grammarNarayan Prasad121–132Jainism: A prominent living indigenous cultureRajjan Kumar133–139Sanskrit literature mein Manaviya Tatva ke roop mein Anukrosha (compassion)Vasantkumar M. Bhatt140–157Jain darshan mein Nirjara TatvaMukul Raj Mehta158–161સરદાર પટેલ યુનિવર્સિટી મ્યુઝિયમમાંની પાંચ નોંધપાત્ર પ્રતિમાઓNandan Hariprasad Shastri162–166श्री'मान' कविविरचित जिनसंगीताष्टक ॥Vijayashilachandrasoori167–195Historical perspective on some contemporary historical eventsRasesh Jamindar196–208Chamundi of Harshacharita of Bana: A critical reviewSudarshan Kumar Sharma209–229ReviewsSatya Ranjan Banerjee, V. M. Kulkarni

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Parul N. Mankad

All articles →
Sambodhi

વિભાવના અને વિશેષોક્તિ અલંકારમાં કાર્યાંશનું બાધ્યત્વ

By Parul N. Mankad

2014
Sambodhi

પૂ.સ્વ. શ્રી નગીનદાસભાઈ શાહને સ્મરણસુમનાંજલિ

By Parul N. Mankad

2014
Sambodhi

Citations of “Setubandha” in Kāvyaśāstra Texts – A Study

By Parul N. Mankad

2000
Sambodhi

સાહિત્યમીમાંસામાં વિચારાયેલું રસસ્વરૂપ

By Parul N. Mankad

1997-98