Articles discussing Anandavardhana
Authorship of the Dhvanyāloka and Ānandavardhana’s Date and Works
Authorship of the Dhvanyaloka and Anandavardhanas Date and Works
K. Krishnamoorthy · The Indian Historical Quarterly, 1948
“And the conclusion he has arrived at is that an identical author is responsible for the composition of both &arika and urtti and thac it is Anandavardhana.”
Sanskrit Aesthetics
V. M. Kulkarni · Sambodhi, 1982
‘Tatparya’ in Bhoja
Tapasvi Shambhuchandra Nandi · Sambodhi, 2001
The author of the Ramabhudaya—his date and identity
Sunil Chandra Ray · The Indian Historical Quarterly, 1954
“The claim of the Ya$ovarmans who were posterior in date to Anandavardhana need not be considered.”
Poetic Creativity; its Manifold manifestations and evaluation
Tapasvi Shambhuchandra Nandi · Sambodhi, 2005
A Critique of Kavyanusasana by Bishnupada Bhattacharjee
Review: Bhoja and Haravijaya of Sarvasena by Dr. V. M. Kulkarni
Narayan M. Kansara · Sambodhi, 1992
“The importance of Sarvasena lies in the fact that the great Sanskrit rhetoricians like Anandavardhana of the Dhvani fame and Kuntaka of the Vakrokti fame have placed him on par with Kaliddsa, and quote from the Harivijaya, as from the Raghuvamsa, the Kumdrasambhava, etc., 10 support his viewpoint that preoccupation with emotion (bhava) and the generation (nispatti) of aesthetic experience (rasa) is the essential method of literature.”
Alankarakarika – a critical study
Parul N. Mankad · Sambodhi, 2002
Review: The Dharma-ratna-karandaka of Vardhamanasiiri
Narayan M. Kansara · Sambodhi, 1992
Prakrit Verses in Dhvanyāloka with Locana
V. M. Kulkarni · Sambodhi, 1979
Rasanirupana of Ajitasenacharya
Parul N. Mankad · Sambodhi, 1990
Rudrata's Treatment of Rasa
Vijay Pandya · Sambodhi, 2006
Indian Theory of Literature
Harivallabh Chunilal Bhayani · Sambodhi, 1990
Śokaḥ Ślokatvam Āgataḥ (Dhv. I. Sd)
Tapasvi Shambhuchandra Nandi · Sambodhi, 1982
Prakrit Poetry and Sanskrit Poetics
V. M. Kulkarni · Sambodhi, 1981
Siddhicandra on Rasa
Tapasvi Shambhuchandra Nandi · Sambodhi, 2006
“The very fact that Siddhicandra (5) has written a work called “kavya-prakasa-khandana”—i.e. “Refutation of The kavya-prakasa (K.P.) (of Mammata), suggests that he is not a die-hard conformist of the rasa-dhvani school of thought as represented by Manmata, who followed the lead of Anandavardhana and Abhinavagupta.”
Comparative Study of Ramayana and Mahabharata: Origins, Themes, and Cultural Impact
Select Contents of the Oriental Journals
Select Contents of Oriental Journals
Is Vastu‑Dhvani an Expendable Form of Poetic Excellence?
Select Contents of Oriental Journals
On Some Quotations of Māgha’s Verses
Ludwik Sternbach · Sambodhi, 1979
Bhatta Nayaka’s Blunder
Tapasvi Shambhuchandra Nandi · Sambodhi, 1977
Buddhivinodakavya (A specimen of Paryayakavya)
D. R. Mankad, Jayashankaren · The Indian Historical Quarterly, 1936
A passage of the Abhidharmakosavyakhya
Vidhushekhara Bhattacharya · The Indian Historical Quarterly, 1926
A Short note on Mr. Jayaswal's interpretation of a Mahabhasya passage in his "Hindu Polity" (p. 122)
The influence of various darśanas on the interpretation and presentation of the Rasa Theory
P. R. Vora · Sambodhi, 2002
Srngare Vipralambhakhye
Ramesh S. Betai · Sambodhi, 1983