Skip to content
Browse articles

‘Tatparya’ in Bhoja

By Tapasvi Shambhuchandra Nandi

Vol. 242001pp. 17–29English, Sanskrit

Summary

Focusing on Bhoja’s theory of tātparya (the intended meaning of a sentence), this article builds on Dr Raghavan’s exposition and examines the textual passages in Bhoja’s writings. After quoting a key passage from Bhoja, the author explains that tātparya arises when the primary meaning of words, implied meaning and suggested meaning together convey the speaker’s intention. Drawing on Sanskrit poetics, the article discusses how the three levels of meaning—abhidhā (direct statement), lakṣaṇā (secondary sense) and dhvani (suggestion)—interact to reveal tātparya. Through examples, it shows that the intended sense may differ from the literal sense and depends on context, speaker’s purpose and convention. The author compares Bhoja’s views with other theorists and highlights the uniqueness of his approach, which emphasises that tātparya is realised only when words, metre and intention align. The discussion also touches on Bhoja’s classification of sentences and his insistence that listeners must grasp tātparya to appreciate poetry fully. By clarifying technical terms and analysing illustrative verses, the article contributes to a better understanding of medieval Indian literary theory.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

Bhoja’s concept of tātparya underscores the importance of context and authorial intent in interpreting language. The study demonstrates that meaning is multilayered—literal, implied and suggested—and that true understanding requires attention to how these layers converge within a sentence.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “Bhoja follows in the gap between the two and greets both with both his hands.”
  • “The first one is purely the tatparya of the Mimamsakas. The second is reserved for implicit sense in sentences used in ordinary parlance, such as “visam bhunksva...” etc.”
  • “Bhoja clearly calls the four viz. vrtti, vivaks3, tatparya and pravibhaga as “Kevala-$§abda-sambandha-$aktayah”.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Prataparudriya vyakhya (Balamano-rama Edn.)
  2. Locana on Dhv. I. 4

Discussed in this article

People

Texts & works

Dynasties, sects & groups

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Tapasvi Shambhuchandra Nandi

All articles →
Sambodhi

Siddhicandra on Rasa

By Tapasvi Shambhuchandra Nandi

2006
Sambodhi

Poetic Creativity; its Manifold manifestations and evaluation

By Tapasvi Shambhuchandra Nandi

2005
Sambodhi

Some Aspects of the Rasa‑Theory

By Tapasvi Shambhuchandra Nandi

2004
Sambodhi

Gita and Gandhiji

By Tapasvi Shambhuchandra Nandi

2003