Skip to content
Browse articles

British Policy in the Context of Bhonsla‑Bhopal Relations 1810‑1814

By John A. Ramalingam

Vol. 38 · No. 1March 1962pp. 8–28English

Summary

This study analyses the rivalry between Raghuji Bhonsla of Nagpur and the Nawab Wazir Mohammad Khan of Bhopal, whose territory lay between Sindia and Bhonsla lands. The Maratha chiefs attacked Bhopal, prompting the Nawab to appeal to the British for protection. The article uses letters and records to show that the British initially adopted a non‑committal stance and declined to conclude a treaty with Bhopal, hoping to maintain good relations with both Bhonsla and Bhopal. When Pindari leaders and Amir Khan intensified plundering in Berar and the Nawab formed defensive alliances, the British intervened diplomatically, advising both sides and discouraging further raids. By 1814 they mediated a settlement that restored seized territories and curbed the aggressive activities of the Marathas and Pindaris without a major military campaign. The article argues that this cautious policy enabled the British to expand their influence in central India by playing local powers against each other and establishing themselves as arbiters.

Summary reviewed by a volunteer editor.

Conclusion

From 1810 to 1814 the British manipulated the conflict between Raghuji Bhonsla and Wazir Mohammad Khan to their advantage. By refusing early pleas from Bhopal yet restraining Maratha aggression and Pindari raids when their interests were threatened, they brokered a peace that protected Bhopal and preserved cordial relations with Nagpur. Through diplomacy rather than force, the British reinforced their authority in the region and set a precedent for later intervention in Maratha affairs.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “The territory of Bhopal, situated as it was between the territories of Sindia and Bhonsla, and adjoining them, was the object of a joint invasion by the troops of the Maratha Confederates.”
  • “The writer ૦£ the article comes to the conclusion that Sindia and Bhonsla’s troops could not conquer Bhopal because of their internal dissensions, and the help which Nawab Wazir Mohammad Khan procured from the Pindaris burtressed his position ‘considcrably, and later on the sheltering arm of the Bricish saved che state from virtual”

Works cited in this article

  1. Ramsay’s Report, 1845 (Govt. Press, Nagpur), p. 16
  2. Poona Residency Records—Nagpur Affairs, vol. V. (1770-1820), p. 279
  3. Imperial Gazetteer of India, vol. 111, (1908), p. 130
  4. Poona Residency Correspondence, vol. 21, Introduction, [2. 19.
  5. The Private Journal of the Marquess of Hastings entry February 1st, 1814.

Discussed in this article

People

Dynasties, sects & groups

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by John A. Ramalingam

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Parsoji Bhonsla

By John A. Ramalingam

June & Sept. 1961
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Battle of Sitabaldi—26th and 27th November, 1817

By John A. Ramalingam

Dec-60