Skip to content
Browse articles

A Note on the “Pusyamitras” of the Bhitari Inscription

By Upendra Thakur

Vol. 37 · No. 4December - 1961pp. 279–286English
Gupta Empire Decline

Summary

In this miscellany, the author revisits H. Fleet’s reading of the Bhitari Pillar Inscription, which described Skandagupta’s supposed victory over the Puṣyamitras. Drawing on a critique by S.V. Sohoni, the article argues that the contested term should be read differently, referring not to a tribe but to elements of the state. It suggests that the verses describe Skandagupta reorganising his army, treasury, allies and territory rather than defeating a particular tribe. The author highlights palaeographic uncertainties and notes that no other sources mention a Puṣyamitra invasion. The essay concludes that Fleet’s interpretation is untenable and that Gupta decline was more likely due to Hun incursions and internal issues than to a shadowy republican tribe.

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

By correcting the reading of the Bhitari Pillar Inscription, the article dispels the myth of a Puṣyamitra invasion of the Gupta empire. It stresses that ambiguous epigraphic terms should be interpreted cautiously and situates the Gupta decline within broader internal and external pressures.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “The term, inspite of all plausible arguments advanced 50 far, reads vague and confusing.”
  • “According to Fleet, फीट fourth verse contained a refer- ence to the Pusyamitra - community of Central India as a power which had caused the temporary downfall of the Gupta empire,”
  • “Whatever the fact, it appears that the. theory of their invasion of the Gupta empire 11 the Bhitari inscription, is unfounded as 16 15 not at all supported by any other evidence, nor do ૪/૦ have any mention of their heroic exploits anywhere.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Fleet, 0/2. 111, 55, Vs, 3-4
  2. Jayaswal, Hindu Polity (2nd-ed,), pp. 163-64
  3. SBE, 2211. 292
  4. Fleet, JRAS., 18%9, p. 228, JRAS., 1911, p. 138
  5. Op. dit., 215

Discussed in this article

Places

Texts & works

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Upendra Thakur

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Institution of Slavery in Mithila

By Upendra Thakur

September - 1959
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Development and Growth of Tantric Religion in Mithila

By Upendra Thakur

Sept & Dec 1958
The Indian Historical Quarterly

A note on the Pancobh Copper‑plate of Saṃgrāmagupta

By Upendra Thakur

December - 1957

Continue reading

Related articles

The Indian Historical Quarterly

Did the Guptas Rule over Orissa?

By Asoka Kumar Rath

June & Sept. 1962
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Gauda-Kamarupa Struggle in the Sixth and Seventh Centuries

By Dineshchandra Sircar

September - 1950