Skip to content
Browse articles

Some Dates in the Bhatika era and its connected problems

By Dasharatha Sharma

Vol. 35 · No. 3September - 1959pp. 227–239English

Summary

The author compiles and analyses inscriptions dated in the little‑understood Bhatika era. Existing dates—from Magha sudi 6, Bhatika 513 (V.S. 1494) to Magha sukla 5, Bhatika 993 (V.S. 1673)—are too late to reveal the era’s origin. Earlier scholars suggested links with the Hijra era or a ruler named Bhettika, but the article demonstrates that such identifications are untenable. Instead, it examines inscriptions from western India, particularly Jaisalmer, and reconstructs the genealogy of the Bhati (Bhatti) rulers who employed the era. By correlating Bhatika dates with Vikrama Samvat and narrative traditions, the author suggests that the era may have begun around the seventh century, possibly commemorating the Bhatis’ migration to Jaisalmer. The article provides chronological tables of rulers and cautions that further discoveries are needed before a definitive epoch can be established.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

By assembling epigraphic evidence and critiquing previous theories, the study narrows down the possible starting point of the Bhatika era. While the precise epoch remains uncertain, the era appears to have been a regional chronological system used by Bhati rulers of western India. The article provides a framework for interpreting Bhatika‑dated inscriptions and underlines the need for new discoveries to resolve this chronological puzzle.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “The carliest dates in the Bhatika હા, known to scholars 50 far, have been Magha sudi 6, Bhatika ૭4111૪2૬, 813, V. 1494, and Migha Sukla 5, Bhagika ડાઈ, 993, V. 1673.”
  • “The capture of Jaisalmer by Ghatasithha may tentatively be placed 10 1 357-8 A. D. when Firuz attacked Shamsuddin's successor, Sikandar Shah.”

Works cited in this article

  1. IHQ., XXIX, pp. 190-95
  2. Culled from the Jaisalmer inscriptions transcribed and forwarded to me by my friends, the indefatigable researchers, Sri Agar Chand Nahta and Sri Bhanwar Lal Nahta.
  3. Nainsi's Kbyat, 1, 9. 329
  4. Unpublished inscription with us
  5. DASHARATHA SHARMA

Discussed in this article

People

  • Thirapala
  • Bhettika
  • Adivaraha
  • Mabarija Sci-Vijayarajadeva
  • Jiya
  • Sri-Jayatasimha
  • Mohana
  • Cahuina
  • Palania Ukadia
  • Rani Sodhi Lachulide
  • Bhojadeva 15
  • Mabarani Devadi
  • Mahamahopadhyaya V. V. Mirashi

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Dasharatha Sharma

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

“Ksitipecaharanapithe Sthapito Vamapadah” of Skandagupta’s Bhitari Pillar Inscription

By Dasharatha Sharma

September & December 1963
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The name of the Mahamatya in the Inscription of Tejasimha, dated V. 1317

By Dasharatha Sharma

December 1962
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Kharparas mentioned in the Nabhinandana-Jinoddhara-Prabandhas

By Dasharatha Sharma

December 1962
The Indian Historical Quarterly

On a Verse of the Pila Inscriptions

By Dasharatha Sharma

June & Sept. 1961

Continue reading

Related articles

The Indian Historical Quarterly

A Note on the Bhatika Era

By G. S. Gai

March - 1959