Skip to content
Browse articles

Observations on the Buddhist remains at Jaggayyapeta

By Debala Mitra

Vol. 35 · No. 3September - 1959pp. 274–275English

Summary

Reporting on a visit to the ruined stupa at Jaggayyapeta, the author makes several corrections to earlier descriptions. He notes that the mound’s diameter is 63 feet, correcting Burgess’ 19th‑century measurement of 31½ feet. Contrary to Burgess’ assertion that the railing had disappeared, the author identifies a fragmentary limestone upright with sockets and a tenon, suggesting that a three‑bar railing once surrounded the procession path. He also finds a drum‑frieze fragment depicting alternating Buddhas and stupas similar to Amaravati sculpture, indicating that an entablature surmounted the drum slab. Additional discoveries include lotus‑petal decorated bases of votive stupas and fragments of yasti and chatra, pointing to a caitya‑griha with small stupas. These observations refine understanding of the monument’s architecture and highlight the need for further excavation.

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

The author’s field observations correct long‑standing misconceptions about Jaggayyapeta’s stupa. By measuring the mound, identifying railing and frieze fragments and recognising votive stupas within a caitya hall, he shows that the monument was more elaborate than previously thought. These findings call for renewed archaeological attention to recover additional architectural elements and artwork.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “Burgess gives the diameter of the mound (by which he evidently means the main si@pa) as 3114 દિ. and this has been repeated by others.”
  • “Actually, the diameter is 63 ft.; Burgess evidently confused the radius with the”
  • “The existence of a caitya-grba at Jaggayyapeta is suggested by two circular stone pieces (pl. 3), their edges relieved with lotus-petals in three tiers.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Jas Burgess, The Buddhist Stapas of Amaravati and Jaggayyapeta, Arch, Surv, Southern India, 1 (London, 1387), p. 107.
  2. Ibid., p. 107.
  3. DeBarLa MriTrA 4 रब, pl, XLIII, 3.
  4. Ibid., pl. XLII, 9.
  5. The photographs published here are the copyright of the Department of Archaeology.

Discussed in this article

People

Texts & works

  • Buddha
  • yasti
  • stépa
  • caitya-grba
  • votive stéipa
  • chatira
  • Buddhist Stapas of Amaravati and Jaggayyapeta
  • Arch, Surv, Southern India

Dynasties, sects & groups

  • Department of Archaeology

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Debala Mitra

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Balijhari (Narasinghpur) Copper-plates of the Somavamsi ruler Udyotakesarin Mahabhavagupta

By Debala Mitra

June - 1959
The Indian Historical Quarterly

A four-armed image of Mahakala

By Debala Mitra

March - 1959
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Indian Museum inscription from Ratnagiri, Orissa

By Debala Mitra

June - 1958
The Indian Historical Quarterly

A temple of the Buddhist God Mahākāla

By Debala Mitra

Mar-58