Skip to content
Browse articles

Criminal Justice under the Colas

By K. S. Ramachandran, C. Krishnamurthi

Vol. 34 · No. 3 and 4Sept & Dec 1958pp. 205–214English

Summary

Using inscriptions and legal records, this paper analyses how the Cola kings of south India administered criminal justice. It focuses on cases of accidental homicide and theft recorded in temple copper‑plates. The author observes that when a person killed someone inadvertently, he was required to endow cows or donate money to temples as compensation. Such endowments were meant to support temple services and obtain religious merit for the offender. The article discusses specific cases where an iron worker accidentally killed a woman with a tool and where a king’s officer caused a death; in both instances the culprits endowed land or cows to temples to avoid further punishment. The study suggests that the courts sought to restore social harmony rather than impose corporal punishment. It notes that temples functioned as both religious and judicial institutions and that the king’s justice relied heavily on customary law and Brahmanical authority. By analysing categories of offences, from accidental homicide to theft and sacrilege, the paper shows that punishments were graded according to intent. The author argues that the Cola legal system illustrates how religious and secular spheres were intertwined in early medieval India. The records also reveal the importance of local assemblies in adjudicating disputes and administering fines.

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

The study shows that Cola criminal law was rooted in notions of restitution and religious expiation rather than retribution. Offenders were expected to compensate victims or temples, and accidental killers often endowed land or cattle. Temples thus served both devotional and judicial functions. This integration of legal and religious spheres helped maintain social order and emphasised the importance of community consensus in early medieval South India.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “Grave crimes, such as, murder, arson and 1006, which in modern times are punished with decapitation, were let off with light chastisement, viz., requiring the culprit to butn a certain number of lamps 10 a temple.”
  • “Accidents in hunting expeditions and misappropriation of temple funds seem ૬૦ be the common crimes.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Arsie No. 352 of 1909
  2. Arsie No. 159 of 1918
  3. Arsie No. 583 of 1904
  4. Arsie No. 162 of 1933

Discussed in this article

People

  • Kullottunga Coladeva
  • Vijayalaya
  • Nakkambi Pattala Havaraiyan
  • Eluvan Vanji Mullaraiyan
  • Madurantakan Gandaradittanar
  • Paluvur Andan
  • Rajakesarivarman Tribhuvanacakravarty Rijadhirdjadeva
  • Aniyupuravan Menmattan
  • Ammuri Pitchan

Places

  • Olakkur
  • Brahmadesam
  • Tirukkalukunram

Texts & works

  • Agastyisvara temple

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Article order

In this issue

Vol. 34 · No. 3 and 4

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by K. S. Ramachandran

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Some Aspects of the Economy of the Indian Megalith Builders

By K. S. Ramachandran

March 1962
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Ardhanarisvara in South Indian Sculpture

By K. S. Ramachandran, C. Krishnamurthi

March - 1960

Continue reading

Related articles

Journal of Indian History and Culture

Bhattas as Teachers in Chola Times

By S. Chandni

September 2006