Skip to content
Browse articles

The Original Traits of Jainism

By Hermann Jacobi

Oct 1967pp. 68–73English

Summary

In this essay, Jacobi provides a detailed analysis of the philosophical and ethical foundations of Jainism, asserting that Jainism holds a distinct metaphysical position apart from other Indian religions, particularly Buddhism. 1. Jainism's Distinct Identity: Jacobi begins by correcting the misconception that Jainism is an offshoot of Buddhism, stressing that Jainism, especially in the case of Mahavira, is a monastic religion with a well-established tradition, not a new revelation or philosophical breakthrough like Buddhism. He compares Mahavira with Gautama Buddha, highlighting that Mahavira was not the founder of Jainism but the last prophet of the tradition. 2. Philosophical Concepts: • Dharma and Adharma: These terms, meaning virtue and vice in other traditions, are uniquely used in Jainism to represent motion (dharma) and rest (adharma), respectively. • Pudgala (Matter): Jainism's view on matter is unique, with the term 'pudgala' being central to their understanding of the physical world, supported by animistic beliefs about the soul's embodiment in matter. • Nigoda (Embodied Souls): Jainism posits an infinite supply of souls, with 'nigoda' representing groups of souls in an elementary form that populate the world, ensuring that samsara (the cycle of birth and rebirth) never runs out of living beings. 3. Karma Theory: The karma theory in Jainism is original, deeply intertwined with animistic views. Jacobi explains that the concept of karma is old and predates Brahmanical influences, existing in Jainism from the earliest texts. Terms like 'asrava' (influx), 'samvara' (stopping), and 'nirjara' (digestion) are part of Jainism's explanation of how karma influences the soul's journey. 4. Ahimsa (Non-Violence): Jainism’s principle of ahimsa goes to the extreme, extending to all living beings, including insects. This strict adherence to non-violence shapes not only monastic life but also the laity’s conduct, guiding them into professions that avoid harm, such as commerce instead of agriculture. 5. Jaina Theory of Being: Jacobi explains the Jaina view of existence as a more practical and commonsensical approach compared to the speculative nature of the Upanisads and the transience of Buddhism. While the Sankhya system compromises between the permanence of the soul and the transient nature of matter, Jainism emphasizes the permanence of the soul and the unceasing change of matter. 6. Jainism's Influence: Jacobi asserts that Jainism significantly influenced Indian philosophy, even pre-dating the logic of the Nyaya-Vaisesika school, and that its systems of asceticism are more original and focused on purging the soul of karmic impurities. 7. Laity's Role: One key feature of Jainism is the integral role of the laity, who are not treated as outsiders but are intimately connected to the monastic community, thus helping Jainism to maintain its integrity for over two millennia, unlike Buddhism, which evolved and eventually disappeared in India.

Summary reviewed by a volunteer editor.

Conclusion

Jainism, as analyzed by Hermann Jacobi, is revealed to be an ancient, original philosophical and religious system—distinct from Buddhism and other Indian traditions—marked by its unique metaphysical doctrines, original ethical concepts such as ahimsa, and an enduring monastic-lay community structure that has ensured its survival and influence through Indian history.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “All who -approach Jaina philosophy will be under the impression that it is a mass of philosophical tenets not upheld by one central idea, and they will wonder what could have given currency to what appears to us an unsystematic system.”
  • “Jainism, says Jacobi, "is a monastic religion. Some European scholars who became acquainted with Jainism through inadequate samples of Jaina literature easily pursuaded themselves that it was an offshoot of Buddhism.”
  • “The lay part of the community were not regarded as outsiders, or only as friends and patrons of the order, as seems to have been the case in early Buddhism; their position was from the beginning well-defined by religious duties and privileges”

Works cited in this article

  1. The Metaphysics and Ethics of the Jainas
  2. The Transactions of The Third International Congress for The History of Religions, Vol. 1I

Discussed in this article

Places

Texts & works

Dynasties, sects & groups

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Hermann Jacobi

All articles →
Jinamanjari

Jainism and the Western World

By Hermann Jacobi, Peter Flügel

1998
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Dialogues that led to the Unification of Jaina Church – Section 2: Between Udaka and Gautama

By Hermann Jacobi

April - 1987
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Jainism

By Hermann Jacobi

April 1974
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Bibliography

By Hermann Jacobi

April 1971