Skip to content
Browse articles

Rana Udayasimha and the Sur Emperors of Delhi

Vol. 30 · No. 1March - 1954pp. 25–30English

Summary

The article examines the relationship between Rana Udayasimha of Mewar and the Sur Emperors of Delhi, specifically Sher Shah and Islam Shah. The author argues that Rana Udayasimha acknowledged the suzerainty of the Sur dynasty for several years following the occupation of Chitor. The main argument is supported by a newly examined stone inscription discovered at Ganesh Biori, a step-well at Toda Raisingh. The inscription, dated November 1547 A.D., lists three associated rulers: Raja Ramachandra Rava, Islam Shah, and Rana Udayasimha. This epigraph indicates that Rana Udayasimha was the ruler of the Kumbhalmera kingdom and owed allegiance to the Sur emperor Islam Shah, who is described as the son of Sher Shah. The author notes that while Muslim historians and local chronicles like Tod's Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan and Ojha's Udaypur Rajyaka Itibas are largely silent or ambiguous about whether Rana Udayasimha submitted to Sher Shah, the Toda Raisingh inscription provides direct evidence of his subordination. The text also references the policy of Sher Shah, who aimed to control strategic communication lines and forts like Chitor without completely uprooting local Rajput chiefs. The author suggests that Rana Udayasimha likely offered allegiance to Sher Shah around 1543 or 1544 A.D. and continued as a feudatory under Islam Shah until at least late 1547 A.D., when he was still ruling from Kumbhalgarh while Chitor remained under Afghan control. The article further discusses Rana Udayasimha's eventual rebellion against the Sur dynasty. Citing Islam Shah's communication to Khawas Khan, the author points out that by 1551 A.D., the Rana had thrown off his allegiance, plundered Sir territory, and carried off Muslim women. The author also references B.N. Reu's Marwar Itibas to contextualize the broader Rajput resistance against the Sur occupation in Marwar, which was expelled by Maladeva around 1546 A.D. Finally, the author uses Cunningham's Archaeological Survey of India Reports and D.C. Sircar's own observations to highlight how the Toda Raisingh inscription challenges the limitations of bardic traditions in accurately mapping the extent of Rana Udayasimha's dominions.

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

This article establishes that Rana Udayasimha acknowledged the suzerainty of the Sur emperors, specifically Sher Shah and Islam Shah, between 1543 and 1547 A.D. The primary evidence is a newly examined stone inscription from 1547 A.D. at Toda Raisingh, which explicitly lists the Rana as a subordinate ruler under Islam Shah. This finding resolves a long-standing historical ambiguity regarding Mewar’s relationship with the Sur dynasty. It indicates that Udayasimha likely submitted to Sher Shah in 1543 or 1544 A.D. and maintained this allegiance for several years. The Rana’s eventual rebellion, documented in Islam Shah’s 1551 A.D. communication to Khawas Khan, marks a significant shift from vassalage to restored independence. The inscription also reveals that Udayasimha’s direct dominion extended to regions like Toda Raisingh, challenging previous assumptions based on bardic traditions that excluded this area from his control.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “Rana Udayasithha was thus a con- &mporary of भी the monarchs of घाट Sir dynasty which flourished 20 Delhi in 1539-56 A.D, છેપદ nothing 15 as yet definitely known 25 regards the Rana’s relations with the Siirs.”
  • “The date of घाट record shows that Rand Udayasirhha acknowledged the suzerainty of the Sir dynasty ac least દા the close of the year 1547 A.D.”
  • “It scems therefore that the Rania offered allegiance to Sher Shih in 1543 or 1544 A.D. and that he continued to rule asa feudatory of the Siirs for some years even after Sher Shih’s death and Islim Shah’s accession to the throne.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Cambridge History of India, vol. 1V, p. 58
  2. Cambridge History of India, vol. 1V, p. 55
  3. Elliot and Dowson, History of India as told by ఠd own Historians, IV, [. 4૦6.
  4. 069. दंड. 9. 718, 7 ૭૪૮૮૭૭૭૦/૭ of Sher ૭૭28. Dacca, (934.
  5. Badauni's Muntakbab-ut.Tawarikh, Ranking’s trans., ૪૦. L 2. 525-26

Discussed in this article

People

  • Sher Shih
  • Khawas Khan
  • Vanavira
  • Islim Shah
  • Rana Udayasimha

Texts & works

  • Udaypur Rajyaka Itibas
  • Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan

Dynasties, sects & groups

  • Rathors
  • Sir dynasty
  • Guhilot

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.