Skip to content
Browse articles

Ksetriya

By V. W. Karambelkar

Vol. 30 · No. 1March - 1954pp. 1–10English

Summary

‘Ksetriya’ article addresses the puzzling disease Kṣetriya described in the Atharva Veda. The author notes that Kṣetriya is mentioned primarily in three hymns—AV II.8, II.10 and III.7—and is incidentally referenced elsewhere but no symptoms are described in these hymns. The hymns ask stars ‘Vichrta’ to release the affliction and pray to a plant Kṣetriya‑nasani to destroy the disease; they mention barley, sesame blossoms and water, but instead of describing symptoms they focus on herbs and cosmic forces. Because of this silence, commentators such as Weber, Jolly, Griffith and Bloomfield interpret Kṣetriya variously as a chronic, hereditary or organic disease, pulmonary consumption or some field injury. Bloomfield connects the disease to yaksma (consumption), while others link it to skin diseases or family curses. The article surveys the ritual practices described in Kauṣika Sūtra: placing the patient outside the house at dawn, washing him with water, pulverising medicinal plants, and fastening objects to the patient’s limbs. These rituals suggest both magical and therapeutic intent. It also reviews medieval commentaries and lexicographical traditions that gloss Kṣetriya as a hereditary disease affecting the entire body. Panini’s grammatical rule 7.2.92 is interpreted as “an incurable disease,” showing that later grammarians understood Kṣetriya as incurable. The article compares the Atharvan material with passages from the Paippalada and Taittiriya recensions, examining textual variants and noting that some hymns are borrowed or rearranged. The author discusses the connections to other diseases like Takman (fever) and yaksma to explore whether Kṣetriya could be a type of consumption. Despite exhaustive analysis, the author concludes that the term may have denoted a general affliction or hereditary disease rather than a specific ailment. The focus on stars, fields, ploughs and agricultural implements indicates a conceptual link between the disease and rural life, leading to speculation that Kṣetriya was associated with agricultural stress or a crop‑related curse. The article highlights how ancient Indian medical and ritual literature used metaphorical language and ritual to handle diseases whose physical nature was elusive and argues that interdisciplinary work between philologists and historians of medicine is needed to understand Kṣetriya’s identity.

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

The article concludes that the hymns provide little information about the symptoms or causes of Kṣetriya; the weight of the evidence suggests it was a hereditary or chronic disorder, possibly related to consumption or skin disease. The rituals described emphasise symbolic cleansing and agricultural imagery, implying a link between the affliction and the fertility of fields. As the author shows, the interpretative vacuum has led to widely divergent explanations, so a definitive identification is unlikely without interdisciplinary study.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “There is a great uncertainty about the nature of the disease, Ksetriya. The hymns dealing with it do not mention a single symptom of the disease.”
  • “Owing to ડોડ complete silence of the hymns about the symptom- atic behaviour- of- the disecase Ksetriya, the commentators and the interpreters are’at a 1055 to name any particular disease by Ksetriya and etcher give a long list of diseases under the term or render 16 too genietally as a ““family disease” or an ‘organic disease’ or a “hereditary disease”..”
  • “All દાડ circumstantial evidence leads ઘડ to think that Ksetriya was a name tor a diseasc or diseases caused by grass-poisoning.”

Works cited in this article

  1. AV, 11.8; 10; and 111.7
  2. Hir. ઉ. 50, 11.3.10
  3. Grh. Sa. ઈ. 15.4.
  4. APs. Srau, ૭૫. 26111. 7.16
  5. Kau. 50. 27.29-31

Discussed in this article

Texts & works

  • Atharvan
  • Ganamala
  • Takmanisana Gana
  • Saunakiya recension
  • Paippalada recension
  • Acharva PariSista 34

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by V. W. Karambelkar

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Matsyendranātha and his Yoginī Cult

By V. W. Karambelkar

December - 1955
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Nababakhanakhanacaritam

By V. W. Karambelkar

September - 1952
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Brahman and Purohita

By V. W. Karambelkar

December - 1950
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Three more Imitations of the Gitagovinda

By V. W. Karambelkar

June - 1949