Skip to content
Browse articles

Kanauj after Harsa’s Death

By Sudhakar Chattopadhyaya

Vol. 30 · No. 2June - 1954pp. 160–166English

Summary

Professor Sudhakar Chattopadhyaya’s essay reconstructs the political history of Kanauj after Emperor Harṣa’s death in 647 CE. Drawing on Chinese records—particularly the accounts of the Tang envoy Wáng Xuǎnzé (Wang‑hiuen‑tse)—the author describes how a usurper named Āla‑na‑shun seized Kanauj and provoked a response from the Tang court. In alliance with rulers of Tibet (Tu‑fan) and Nepal, the Chinese expeditionary force stormed the city, executed thousands and captured the usurper. The article details subsequent struggles among regional powers, including the entry of the rising Bengal kingdom and the Gurjara‑Pratihāras, and notes that Kanauj remained a coveted prize because control of the Ganges plain conferred economic and political pre‑eminence. Chattopadhyaya analyses Sanskrit, Tibetan and Chinese sources to trace later rulers and argues that instability in Kanauj opened the way for the Tripartite Struggle among the Pratihāras, Rāṣṭrakūṭas and Palas. By placing the Chinese expedition in the broader context of north Indian history, the article sheds light on how trans‑Himalayan diplomacy and warfare influenced the politics of early medieval India.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

The study concludes that Harṣa’s death precipitated a power vacuum in Kanauj which external powers quickly exploited. Chinese intervention not only restored order temporarily but also underscored the international dimensions of early medieval Indian politics, setting the stage for protracted contests among Indian dynasties.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • ““The period from the fall of- the usurper to the rise of YaSovarman, nearly three quarters of a century later, is one of the darkest in the whole range of the history of Kanauj, and every event ૦ that time 15 hidden from view by a thick veil of”
  • “In this paper, we shall 0૬5૬ discuss the history of the “‘usurper” noting specially if फिट had any connection with the said region and then whether 1૬ 15 possible to throw any light into the darkness after his fall.”

Works cited in this article

  1. History of Kanauj, 192
  2. Petech, A Study on the Chronicles of Ladakb. 51
  3. Majumdar, History of Bengal, 1, 79
  4. Parker, Journal of the Manchester Oriental Society, 191 1, 133
  5. Ep. Ind., XXIV. 283

Discussed in this article

People

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Sudhakar Chattopadhyaya

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Later Imperial Guptas

By Sudhakar Chattopadhyaya

June - 1953
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Achaemenids and India

By Sudhakar Chattopadhyaya

June - 1950
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Foreign Notices of Achaemenid India

By Sudhakar Chattopadhyaya

March - 1950
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Tribal Immigrations in Achaemenid India

By Sudhakar Chattopadhyaya

December - 1949