Skip to content
Browse articles

The Later Imperial Guptas

By Sudhakar Chattopadhyaya

Vol. 29 · No. 2June - 1953pp. 156–161English

Summary

This article charts the fortunes of the Gupta dynasty after the zenith of imperial power, tracing the lineage of later rulers and the shrinking territorial extent of their authority. Drawing on inscriptions, coins and foreign accounts, the author reconstructs the reigns of lesser‑known monarchs such as Purugupta and Narasimhagupta Baladitya, who struggled to uphold imperial claims amid Huna incursions and the rise of rival dynasties. The paper notes shifts in titulature, economic changes reflected in debased coinage, and the persistence of cultural patronage despite political decline. By situating the later Guptas within the mosaic of regional powers emerging in north India, the article illuminates the transition from the classical to the early medieval period.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

The study concludes that although the Gupta dynasty persisted for several generations beyond its golden age, it became one among many regional powers and could no longer command pan‑Indian allegiance. This awareness helps historians understand the fragmentation of political authority in the sixth century and the emergence of new states.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “It is now generally believed that Skanda Gupta, whose last known date 15 467 A.D., was succeeded by his balf-brother Puru 615૩.”
  • “In the present state of our knowledge, it may be stated then that Puru Gupta and Kumara Gupta II of the Sarnath record ruled successively from 467 A.D. to ૦. 476 A.D. and then followed the reign of Budha Gupta for twenty years, c. 476 A.D.—495/6 A.D.”
  • “The main difficulty in accepting the view is that, first, we have to accommodate three kings within a comparatively short period of nine years; and secondly, Narasimha Gupta 15 the only Imperial Gupta king who takes the title of Biladitya.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Hindusthan Review, 1918, Jan; IBORS., 1918, 412-7
  2. MASL, 64, 66; Ep. Ind., XXVI, 235; IHQ., XIX, 119
  3. सभा, 494-505
  4. NHIP, VI, 184
  5. The Chinese account has been rejected for it makes Budha Gupta a son of Sakraditya, 1.૯. Kumira Gupta I, while the Nilanda seal shows that he was the son of Puru Gupta, IHQ., XIX, 123-4; but sec infra.

Discussed in this article

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Sudhakar Chattopadhyaya

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Kanauj after Harsa’s Death

By Sudhakar Chattopadhyaya

June - 1954
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Achaemenids and India

By Sudhakar Chattopadhyaya

June - 1950
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Foreign Notices of Achaemenid India

By Sudhakar Chattopadhyaya

March - 1950
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Tribal Immigrations in Achaemenid India

By Sudhakar Chattopadhyaya

December - 1949

Continue reading

Related articles

The Indian Historical Quarterly

Evidence of the Nālanda Seals

By Dineshchandra Sircar

September - 1943