Some Passages from the Kavindra-vacana-samuccaya
Summary
Editing the Kavindra‑vacana‑samuccaya from a single damaged manuscript poses many problems. In this note the author revisits passages that remain obscure even after F. W. Thomas’s meticulous 1912 edition. The manuscript is fragmentary and often corrupt, making syntax and meaning difficult. The author proposes orthographic emendations to restore sense. One example is stanza 23, which describes Viṣṇu’s conch‑shell emerging from the churning of the ocean. By correcting miscopied letters and verb forms—changing masculine to neuter endings and reading ‘Karajasrīraya’ instead of an unintelligible phrase—the stanza becomes grammatical and interpretable. The adjusted translation portrays the conch glowing with the light of Śiva’s fingernails and surrounded by smaller shells. The author applies similar techniques to other problematic verses. The note illustrates how careful philology can salvage sense from corrupt texts and underscores the importance of critical editions for preserving Sanskrit anthologies.
AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.
Conclusion
By proposing targeted emendations grounded in grammar and context, the article clarifies difficult passages in the Kavindra‑vacana‑samuccaya. It demonstrates that even a single, damaged manuscript can yield coherent readings when editors combine philological rigour with literary sensitivity. Such work ensures that valuable anthologies remain accessible to scholars.