Skip to content
Browse articles

Concordance of the Fauna in the Ramayana

By Sibadas Chaudhuri

Vol. 29 · No. 3September - 1953pp. 276–285English, Sanskrit

Summary

Sibadas Chaudhuri’s article “Concordance of the Fauna in the Rāmāyaṇa” provides a systematic index of animal names mentioned in Vālmīki’s epic. Recognising that the Rāmāyaṇa is rich in descriptions of the natural world, Chaudhuri compiles references to birds, mammals, reptiles and mythical creatures across the poem’s seven books. For each animal he lists the Sanskrit term, an English or vernacular equivalent and citations of cantos and verses where the term appears. The concordance includes domesticated animals such as horses, elephants and cows; wild creatures like lions, tigers, deer and monkeys; aquatic beings including fish and crocodiles; and avian species like peacocks, parrots and swans. Chaudhuri notes that certain animals carry symbolic meanings—for example, the vulture Jaṭāyus represents loyalty, while monkeys personify bravery and devotion in the Kiṣkindhā episode. The article also highlights regional terms and dialectal variants used in different recensions. Chaudhuri sometimes cross‑references the Rāmāyaṇa’s fauna with zoological information from the Mahābhārata and Purāṇas to clarify identifications. For species where the Sanskrit term is ambiguous or has multiple referents, he discusses philological interpretations and cites Ayurvedic or lexicographical sources. The concordance is arranged alphabetically by animal name, with each entry followed by a list of book (kāṇḍa) and verse numbers. Because the article is primarily a reference tool, it does not present a narrative argument but serves scholars interested in the epic’s ecological imagery. By cataloguing the fauna, Chaudhuri enables comparative studies on symbolism, mythology and ecology in classical Sanskrit literature. He concludes that the rich animal imagery of the Rāmāyaṇa reflects the poet’s intimate knowledge of forests and wildlife and underscores the epic’s setting in a landscape teeming with diverse creatures.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

Chaudhuri concludes that compiling a concordance of the Rāmāyaṇa’s fauna helps preserve the epic’s natural history and provides a resource for philologists and historians of zoology. The careful indexing of animal references demonstrates the breadth of Vālmīki’s zoological knowledge and invites further study of how animals function symbolically and narratively within the poem

Works cited in this article

  1. Geldner, Rigveda Glossar, 149
  2. RV, x.68.8; AV, ઢાં. 2. 25; Vaja. Sam. xxiv. 21. 34; Sata, Dra., 1. हि, 1. 1.; Kaus. Up., 1. 2; Mait. Sam., iii. 9. 5; Tait. Sam., ii. ઈ. 6. 1; Chan. Up.,i. 4 3) Brbad. Upa., 1૪. 3. 18.
  3. Tait. Sam, ૪. 5, 19; Vaja. Sam., xxiv, 27, 39; Mait. Sam, iii, 14, ૧; RV, ખાં, 75. 15; Mohenjo. (Marshall}—SD. 2608, 872

Discussed in this article

Texts & works

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Sibadas Chaudhuri

All articles →
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Decimal Classification of Jainistic Studies—A Draft Outline

By Sibadas Chaudhuri

July-1972
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Place-names in the Vamana Purana

By Sibadas Chaudhuri

March and June 1963
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Place-Names in the Vamana Purana

By Sibadas Chaudhuri

December 1962
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Place-names in the Garuda Purana

By Sibadas Chaudhuri

March - 1961