Skip to content
Browse articles

On the Date of the Ellora Plates of Dantidurga

By G. S. Gai

Vol. 28 · No. 1March - 1952pp. 79–82English

Summary

Addressing a long‑debated issue, this note reassesses the date of the Ellora copper‑plates issued by the Rāṣṭrakūṭa king Dantidurga. Previous scholars had read the numerical signs on the plates as indicating the year 603 or 606 of the Śaka era and consequently dated the grant to the late seventh century. Professor Mirashi argued that the date should be taken in the Kālacuri era. The present author examines the physical form of the numerals, noting that the supposed ‘6’ is actually a symbol for 40 with a cross‑bar added by scribes to guide engravers. By comparing the notation with figures in early Nāgarī and in the Khāṇḍerī inscription of King Amoghavarṣa, he demonstrates that the second symbol denotes 40 and not 6. Moreover, since the plate does not mention Śaka rulers, the absence of an era specification does not justify assuming the Śaka era. Taking the revised reading, the author proposes that the date corresponds to Śaka 643 (A.D. 721) and shows that this fits the historical context of Dantidurga’s rise. The article therefore rejects earlier conjectures and situates the Ellora plates firmly in the mid‑eighth century, improving our understanding of early Rāṣṭrakūṭa chronology.

AI-generated summary, automatically checked against the article text.

Conclusion

By offering a palaeographic re‑examination of numeral symbols, the article concludes that Dantidurga’s Ellora plates date to the eighth century (Śaka 643) rather than the late seventh century. This adjustment sharpens the chronology of early Rāṣṭrakūṭa history and underscores the need for careful epigraphic analysis.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “These plates have been published 10 the Epigraphia Indica, vol. XXV, pp. 25-31. The date-portion has been read as 581 6૦૦ 60 3 ૮(4) fvayuja iuddba trayodaiyath Somavare and this year has been referted to the Saka હાત.”
  • “Recently Professor Mirashi has questioned both the reading ૦ this date and the era to which it is referred! [115 arguments are : (1) The details of the date do 0૦% work out satisfactorily and therefore it 15 doubtful if the date really refers to the Saka હા.”
  • “Thus Professor Mirashi’s view that पीट .date ઝં the Ellora plates of Dantidurga should be read 35 463 and should be referred to the Kalacuri era 15 not tenable.”

Works cited in this article

  1. Epigraphia Indica, vol. XXV, pp. 25-31
  2. Indian Ephemeris
  3. Journal of the Bombay Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, vol. XVI, plate facing pp. 108-9

Discussed in this article

People

Places

Texts & works

  • Ellora Plates
  • Nagardhan plates

Dynasties, sects & groups

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by G. S. Gai

All articles →
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Later Mauryas in Indian History

By G. S. Gai

December - 1961
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Tarkkari

By G. S. Gai

September - 1959
The Indian Historical Quarterly

A Note on the Bhatika Era

By G. S. Gai

March - 1959