Skip to content
Browse articles

The Maharajas Svamidasa, Bhuluṇḍa and Rudradāsa

By Dineshchandra Sircar

Vol. 22 · No. 1March - 1946pp. 64–65English

Summary

In his companion note 'The Maharajas Svamidasa, Bhuluṇḍa and Rudradāsa' Dines Chandra Sircar analyses three copper‑plate grants from the Indore region that shed light on obscure local rulers. The first grant, edited by R. C. Majumdar, belongs to Maharaja Svamidasa and is dated to the year 67 of an unspecified era; the second grant belongs to Maharaja Bhuluṇḍa and is dated to year 107; and the third belongs to Rudradāsa and is dated to year 117. Sircar compares the scripts and titles used in these grants, noting that the term ‘Maharaja’ is employed for minor rulers but that the overlords are styled ‘Paramabhattaraka’ and ‘Paramesvara’. He argues that Svamidasa, Bhuluṇḍa and Rudradāsa were independent monarchs or feudatories who ruled small territories near Khandesh in the fourth to fifth centuries A.D., possibly aligned with the Abhira or Kalachuri‑Cedi dynasties. By correlating dates with known historical events, Sircar proposes that their era may correspond to A.D. 316‑367. He observes that the inscription of Svamidasa resembles that of the Sanchi copper‑plate of Chandragupta II dated 93 of the Gupta era (412 A.D.), suggesting a similar timeframe. The article discusses the significance of these grants for understanding the political landscape of western India during the decline of the Western Satraps and the rise of the Gupta empire. Sircar concludes that while the three rulers carried the title ‘Maharaja’, they were likely regional chiefs who acknowledged the suzerainty of larger powers and performed the Asvamedha or other sacrifices to assert prestige. He calls for further discovery and study of local grants to clarify the history of Khandesh and adjacent regions.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

This note reveals how minor copper‑plate grants can illuminate the patchwork of authority in early medieval India. By situating the grants of Svamidasa, Bhuluṇḍa and Rudradāsa within the broader chronology of western India, Sircar demonstrates that small principalities persisted alongside imperial powers. His careful comparison of scripts and titles underscores the fluid hierarchy of overlords and vassals. The study encourages scholars to pay attention to little‑known inscriptions as they may offer vital clues about regional politics.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “It was suggested that Svamidaésa and Bhulunda ruled somewhere in the western part of Central India as feudatories of the Gupta emperors and dated their charters in the Gupta era, the reckoning of their overlords.”
  • “These princes”, he says, “who were evidently ruling in Khandesh were probably feudatories 6f the Abhiras whose era they have used in their records. The years 67, 107 and I17 mentioned in their grants therefore correspond to A. D. 316-17, 356-57 and 366-67 respectively.”
  • “The style Parama-bhattdraka-pddanudhyata can hardly be expected in a record of 316 A. D. before the rise of the imperial Guptas.”

Works cited in this article

  1. El., XV, p. 286 ff
  2. InJA., XVI, p. 98f.
  3. ‘An Ancient Dynasty of Khandesh’ in the Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, 1944, p. 62 ff.
  4. the Sanchi inscription of Candragupta II of the year 93 of the Gupta era corresponding to 412 A.D.
  5. Vakataka inscriptions

Discussed in this article

People

Places

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Dineshchandra Sircar

All articles →
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Some Unpublished Jaina Sculptures of Ganesa from the Western India

By Dineshchandra Sircar

Jan - 1975
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Mahavira’s Theory of Samatva Yoga — a Psycho-Analytical Approach

By Dineshchandra Sircar

Jan - 1975
Jain Journal A Quarterly on Jainology

Jaina Temples in East Bengal in the Seventeenth Century

By Dineshchandra Sircar

Jan - 1975
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Date of the Periplus

By Dineshchandra Sircar

March and June 1963