Skip to content
Browse articles

Śrīvatsācārya, a long‑forgotten Naiyāyika

By Dinesh Chandra Bhattacharya

Vol. 22 · No. 2Jun-46pp. 152–154English, Sanskrit

Summary

In this miscellany piece the author introduces Śrīvatsācārya, a little‑known figure in Indian philosophy. The only known reference to Śrīvatsa comes from Rājashekhara’s commentary on the Nyāya‑kaṇḍalī, where he lists four commentaries on the Prasastapāda‑bhāṣya, including a Līlāvatī by Śrīvatsācārya. Because no works of Śrīvatsa were known, scholars assumed this was a mistaken reference to Śrī Vallabha’s Nyāyālaṭāvatī. The author disputes that assumption, citing Udayanācārya’s Nyāya‑vārttika‑tātparya‑pariśuddhi, which mentions a commentary by Śrīvatsa and reproduces verses from it. A fragment of this work, written in old Bengali script and containing 26 folios, is in the author’s possession. The manuscript’s marginalia refer to it as a ‘Vṛtti’ or ‘Nibandha,’ indicating a commentary. The article summarises its contents—opening with a dedicatory verse to Kṛṣṇa and then discussing categories of Nyāya metaphysics—and notes colophons that suggest it was completed twice. Evidence of Śrīvatsa’s existence leads the author to conclude that he was probably a pupil of Udayana and active around the 10th or 11th century. The rediscovery of his work corrects the belief that Rājashekhara’s reference was careless and underscores the richness of regional Nyāya literature.

AI-assisted summary, not yet checked. Consult the original PDF before citing.

Conclusion

The article concludes that Śrīvatsācārya was a genuine Naiyāyika scholar whose commentary survives in a rare Bengali manuscript. This finding corrects the assumption that Rājashekhara’s reference was careless and highlights the richness of regional Nyāya traditions. By examining and publishing neglected texts, historians can better appreciate the diversity of Indian philosophical commentaries and reconstruct the intellectual milieu of medieval Bengal.

Key passages

Chosen by AI from the article's text. Each one is checked word for word against the text before it is shown.

  • “Srivatsa is at present almost unknown in the history of Indian philosophy.”
  • “As no such work of Srivatsa is ever known it was commonly believed that the Jaina writer was carelessly referring here to Srivallabha's Nyayalilavati”

Works cited in this article

  1. Nydyakandali (of Sridhara)
  2. Nydya-vartika-tatparya-pariguddhi
  3. Prasastapada-bhasyam with Kandali, Vizianagram Ed., 1895
  4. Tatparyatika, Vizia. Ed., p. 363
  5. Tanjore Cat., XI, p. 4484

Discussed in this article

Texts & works

  • Lilavati
  • Nydya-vartika-tatparya-pariguddhi

AI guide

Discuss this record

Ask about the article, its topics, issue context, selected passages, or reading strategy.

Start with the record

I can unpack the summary, turn it into study questions, explain a selected passage, or compare it with the other articles in this issue.

Original PDF

Inline viewer

Checking source PDF

The viewer will load here if the archive file is reachable.

Same author

More by Dinesh Chandra Bhattacharya

All articles →
Sambodhi

Kalinjar Fort: The Time Winner Ancientmost Fort of India

By Dinesh Chandra Bhattacharya

1996
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Was Jalal-ud-Din the Patron of Rayamukuta?

By Dinesh Chandra Bhattacharya

June - 1953
The Indian Historical Quarterly

The Sraddhasagara of Kulluka Bhatta

By Dinesh Chandra Bhattacharya

June - 1951
The Indian Historical Quarterly

Gaṅgādāsa and his Father Gopāladasa

By Dinesh Chandra Bhattacharya

December - 1948